ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2021
RDW Value may Increase the Diagnostic Accuracy of MPS.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Potential of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Platelet Ratio (RDW/PLT) in Early Pregnancy Loss.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- High red blood cell distribution width associated with incident frailty in patients with cardiometabolic diseases: A longitudinal study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between red blood cell distribution width and mortality in severe osteomyelitis patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Early predicting 30-day mortality in sepsis in MIMIC-III by an artificial neural networks model.European journal of medical research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAs the feasibility of obtaining health care has improved in the last decade, there is an increase in the number of performing unnecessary coronary angiogram. Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW), which shows erythrocyte dispersion volume, is associated with coronary artery disease. The present study aims to evaluate the relationship between RDW value and the severity of coronary artery disease in patients who undergo myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) as an evaluation for coronary ischemia and after which patients had a coronary angiography.
methodsThis retrospective study included 452 patients diagnosed as stabile angina that had MPS to evaluate coronary ischemia and after which coronary angiography was performed. Complete blood count was obtained on the same day. Patients were first divided into two groups: patients with and without ischemia on MPS. Then, the group who had ischemia on the MPS where divided into another two groups: patients who had RDW values ≥13.5 and the others who had RDW value <13.5. Patients who had fixed perfusion defect, chronic kidney disease, thyroid dysfunction, hematological disease, those who use iron supplements, and those who had active infectious disease were excluded from this study.
resultsThe basic characteristics were the same between study groups. We found that severe coronary vessel disease, single vessel, two vessels and three vessels diseases were higher in patients who had ischemia on the MPS and RDW values ≥13.5 (p-value were 0.032, 0.004, 0.042 respectively). RDW values ≥13.5 was found to be an independent predictor for the presence of severe coronary artery disease (p<0.001 OR: 3.55).
conclusionPatients who have MPS for ischemic evaluation and RDW values of ≥ 13.5 were more severe coronary heart diseases. As a result, the findings suggest that using of RDW value is a cheap and feasible parameter that may prevent performing unnecessary coronary angiography for patients after MPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.