Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33935472›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2022

Pandemic grief in Poland: adaptation of a measure and its relationship with social support and resilience.

Sebastian Skalski, Karol Konaszewski, Paweł Dobrakowski, Janusz Surzykiewicz, Sherman A Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Measuring Vulnerability in Grief: The Psychometric Properties of the Italian Adult Attitude to Grief Scale.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Pandemic grief in El Salvador: factors that predict dysfunctional grief due to a COVID-19 death among Salvadoran adults.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastian SkalskiInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1 Jaracza Street, 00-378 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6336-7251
Karol KonaszewskiFaculty of Education, University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-4245
Paweł DobrakowskiInstitute of Psychology, Humanitas University, Sosnowiec, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-2487
Janusz SurzykiewiczFaculty of Philosophy and Education, Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Eichstaett, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6099-7226
Sherman A LeeDepartment of Psychology, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, VA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-3472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of people are mourning the death of a loved to COVID-19. According to previous studies, the circumstances of coronavirus disease-related deaths may lead to dysfunctional grief. The purpose of this study was to introduce the Polish adaptation of the Pandemic Grief Scale (PGS) as well as to assess the relationship between dysfunctional grief due to a COVID-19 death, resilience and perceived social support. The adaptation was carried out on a general population sample of 286 individuals aged 18-54 years, with the evaluation being performed on a group comprising 214 people aged 18-78 years, who lost a loved one during the pandemic. The Polish version of PGS revealed a single-factor structure with strong internal consistency (α = 0.89). The PGS scores were associated with measures of complicated grief (Inventory of Complicated Grief), depression (Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale) and lower resilience (Resilience Scale 14), which confirmed the scale's convergent validity. No relation between PGS scores and health behaviors (Inventory of Health Behaviors) was observed, which confirmed the scale's discriminant validity. The results of the bootstrapping technique revealed that resilience mediates the relationship between perceived social support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support) and dysfunctional grief (total mediation). The results of this study suggest the need for practitioners to focus on resilience-enhancing interventions and perceived social support in order to improve mental health in people who lost their loved ones during the new coronavirus pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Dysfunctional griefPandemic grief scalePerceived social supportResilience

Identifiers

PMID33935472
PMCPMC8064881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.