ArticleVeterinary world2021
Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of
Article in Veterinary world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a recombinant Omp19+31-based indirect hemagglutination assay for serological diagnosis of bovine and ovine brucellosis.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of multiepitope fusion proteins for serological diagnosis of animal brucellosis.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Follow-up of antibody changes in brucellosis patients in Gansu, China.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Bovine brucellosis sero-prevalence trend during 2011-14 and 2015-18 in Indian sub-continent.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Ghostbuster-A Western Blot-Based Panel Method to Resolve False-Positive Brucellosis Serology Test Results.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Evaluation of twin-arginine translocation substrate proteins as potential antigen candidates for serodiagnosis of brucellosis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- In silico designed novel multi-epitope mRNA vaccines against Brucella by targeting extracellular protein BtuB and LptD.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Production and evaluation of anti-BP26 monoclonal antibodies for the serological detection of animal brucellosis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Serodiagnosis of human brucellosis by an indirect ELISA test using recombinant outer membrane protein 19 kDa (rOMP19) as an antigen.BMC biotechnology · 2023Article
- False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Review
- Brucellosis detection and the role ofVeterinary world · 2023Review
- Evaluation of chimeric proteins for serological diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle.Veterinary world · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe present serodiagnosis of brucellosis in livestock is based on the whole cell or smooth lipopolysaccharide of the MATERIALS AND
methodsProtein antigens of
resultsAll the selected protein antigens were expressed and in the Western blot with
conclusionBP26 could be a potential diagnostic antigen among the immunodominant proteins of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.