ArticleScientometrics2021
The sharing of research data facing the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Scientometrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical Governance of Open Data Across Biomedical Research, Healthcare, and Public Health: Privacy, Equity, Trust, and Controlled Access.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Article
- The quest to share data.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- Insights from ARCOS-V's Transition to Remote Data Collection during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Study.Neuroepidemiology · 2025Article
- Addressing the gap in health data management skills: an online self-guided course for researchers and health professionals.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The status of MRI databases across the world focused on psychiatric and neurological disorders.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024Review
- Cooperation in the Time of COVID.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024Review
- North-south scientific collaborations on research datasets: a longitudinal analysis of the division of labor on genomic datasets (1992-2021).Frontiers in big data · 2023Article
- Habits and perceptions regarding open science by researchers from Spanish institutions.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- The worsening divergence of biotechnology: the importance of risk culture.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Publications About COVID-19 Research by the BME Community.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19: A first approach.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2022Article
- Standardizing, harmonizing, and protecting data collection to broaden the impact of COVID-19 research: the rapid acceleration of diagnostics-underserved populations (RADx-UP) initiative.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Review
- Open data and data sharing in articles about COVID-19 published in preprint servers medRxiv and bioRxiv.Scientometrics · 2022Article
- Open science practices in general and internal medicine journals, an observational study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Transparency of COVID-19-Related Research in Dental Journals.Frontiers in oral health · 2022Article
- GA4GH Passport standard for digital identity and access permissions.Cell genomics · 2021Article
- Evidence Gaps and Challenges in the Fight Against COVID-19 in Africa: Scoping Review of the Ethiopian Experience.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- The sharing of research data facing the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientometrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the previous Ebola and Zika outbreaks, researchers shared their data, allowing many published epidemiological studies to be produced only from open research data, to speed up investigations and control of these infections. This study aims to evaluate the dissemination of the COVID-19 research data underlying scientific publications. Analysis of COVID-19 publications from December 1, 2019, to April 30, 2020, was conducted through the PubMed Central repository to evaluate the research data available through its publication as supplementary material or deposited in repositories. The PubMed Central search generated 5,905 records, of which 804 papers included complementary research data, especially as supplementary material (77.4%). The most productive journals were
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.