Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33935116›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine2021

The Adolescent/Young Adult Self-Management and Independence Scale (AMIS-II): Expanding evidence for validity and reliability.

Monique M Ridosh, Colleen Stiles-Shields, Alexa Stern, Adrien M Winning, Lara Anderson, Kathleen J Sawin, Grayson N Holmbeck

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monique M RidoshMarcella Niehoff School of Nursing, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Colleen Stiles-ShieldsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexa SternDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Adrien M WinningDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lara AndersonDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kathleen J SawinDepartment of Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Grayson N HolmbeckDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Self-Management in Adolescents and Young Adults with Spina BifidaR01NR016235 · NINR · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HOLMBECK, GRAYSON NEIL · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Psychosocial Adjustment in Adolescents with Spina BifidaR01HD048629 · NICHD · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HOLMBECK, GRAYSON NEIL · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD048629NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Adolescent/Young Adult Self-Management and Independence Scale-II (AMIS-II), an interview-based measure of self-management for youth with chronic health conditions.

methodsA diverse sample of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with spina bifida (SB) (n = 64 AYA; mean 20.88; age range 18-25 years) completed an AMIS-II interview. Six years earlier, parents from 55 families completed questionnaires that assessed children's responsibility for SB-related care (Sharing of Spina Bifida Management Responsibilities) and their ability to perform skills across condition-related tasks (The Spina Bifida Independence Survey). Parents also reported on child's communication skills, adaptive behaviors, and independent management of finances (Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition; Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised). Descriptive and correlational analyses were conducted to assess the construct validity and the internal consistency reliability of the AMIS-II.

resultsThe AMIS-II demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability (AMIS-II total scale α= 0.95; subscales α= 0.90 -0.91). Evidence in support of construct validity was found in associations between the AMIS-II and measures of child responsibility for SB-related care, ability to perform condition-related skills, and adaptive behaviors (r's = 0.378 -0.777; p's < 0.05).

conclusionThis study provides further evidence of strong reliability and validity for the AMIS-II. Additional research with this measure will facilitate a better understanding of factors related to self-management behaviors in adolescents and young adults with spina bifida.

Indexed as

Self-ManagementSpinal DysraphismAdolescentAdultChildHumansLongitudinal StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultadolescentsindependenceparentsSelf-managementspina bifidayoung adults

Identifiers

PMID33935116
PMCPMC8788943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.