ArticleClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2022
Feeding intolerance in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Article in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effects of Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of peptide-based versus standard polymeric enteral nutrition in ICU patients at high nutritional risk: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Which critically ill patients are more susceptible to the adverse effects associated with feeding intolerance? A secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal complications in intensive care.Medical review (2021) · 2025Review
- The impact of enteral feeding intolerance on the prognosis of patients with septic shock in South Korea.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence real-time automated recognition of the gastric antrum cross-sectional area and motility rhythm via bedside ultrasound: a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enteral feeding protocol: a quality improvement project on feeding interruptions and clinical outcomes in a tertiary intensive care unit.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Modifying feeding protocols in critically ill patients based on a predictive model of feeding intolerance: protocol for a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial (the mNEED study).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of outcome indicators in clinical trials related to feeding intolerance in ICU patients receiving enteral nutrition feeding.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The Influence of Prone Positioning on Energy and Protein Delivery in COVID-19 Patients Requiring ECMO Support.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Clinical practice guidelines for nutritional assessment and monitoring of adult ICU patients in China.Journal of intensive medicine · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with acute gastrointestinal injury: prospective observational study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Lung Ultrasound Score as a Predictor of Failure to Wean COVID-19 Elderly Patients off Mechanical Ventilation: A Prospective Observational Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Observational
- Bedside naso-jejunal placement is more difficult, but successful in patients with COVID-19 in critical care: A retrospective service evaluation of a dietitian-led service.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2023Article
- Different definitions of feeding intolerance and their associations with outcomes of critically ill adults receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of intensive care · 2023Review
- Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein (I-FABP) as a Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nutrition support practices across the care continuum in a single centre critical care unit during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic - A comparison of VV-ECMO and non-ECMO patients.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Observational
- Nutritional intake and gastro-intestinal symptoms in critically ill COVID-19 patients.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Observational
- COVID-19: Lessons on malnutrition, nutritional care and public health from the ESPEN-WHO Europe call for papers.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Article
- Reduced circulating FABP2 in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 may indicate enterocyte functional change rather than cell death.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsEarly reports suggest significant difficulty with enteral feeding in critically ill COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to characterize the prevalence, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of feeding intolerance in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
methodsWe examined 323 adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of Massachusetts General Hospital between March 11 and June 28, 2020 who received enteral nutrition. Systematic chart review determined prevalence, clinical characteristics, and hospital outcomes (ICU complications, length of stay, and mortality) of feeding intolerance.
resultsFeeding intolerance developed in 56% of the patients and most commonly manifested as large gastric residual volumes (83.9%), abdominal distension (67.2%), and vomiting (63.9%). Length of intubation (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08), ≥1 GI symptom on presentation (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.97), and severe obesity (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66) were independently associated with development of feeding intolerance. Compared to feed-tolerant patients, patients with incident feeding intolerance were significantly more likely to suffer cardiac, renal, hepatic, and hematologic complications during their hospitalization. Feeding intolerance was similarly associated with poor outcomes including longer ICU stay (median [IQR] 21.5 [14-30] vs. 15 [9-22] days, P < 0.001), overall hospitalization time (median [IQR] 30.5 [19-42] vs. 24 [15-35], P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (33.9% vs. 16.1%, P < 0.001). Feeding intolerance was independently associated with an increased risk of death (HR 3.32; 95% CI 1.97-5.6).
conclusionsFeeding intolerance is a frequently encountered complication in critically ill COVID-19 patients in a large tertiary care experience and is associated with poor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.