Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33934848›Full record

ReviewGynecologic oncology2021

Uterine serous carcinoma.

Giorgio Bogani, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Nicole Concin, Natalie Y L Ngoi, Philippe Morice, Takayuki Enomoto, Kazuhiro Takehara, Hannelore Denys, Remi A Nout, Domenica Lorusso and 22 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 15 countries.

Giorgio BoganiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: giorgiobogani@yahoo.it.
Isabelle Ray-CoquardCentre Leon Bérard, Hesper lab. EA 7425 Université Claude Bernard Lyon Est, Lyon, France.
Nicole ConcinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Natalie Y L NgoiNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Philippe MoriceGystave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Takayuki EnomotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Japan.
Kazuhiro TakeharaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Japan.
Hannelore DenysMedical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Remi A NoutErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Domenica LorussoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Michelle M VaughanMedical Oncology, Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Marta BiniFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Masashi TakanoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Diane ProvencherCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Alice IndiniMedical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital Policlinic, Milan, Italy.
Satoru SagaeGynecologic Oncology Unit, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Pauline WimbergerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl-Gustav-Carus University, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany on behalf of the AGO-Ovar, Germany.
Robert PókaInstitute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Yakir SegevCarmel Medical Center, Affiliated to the Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Se Ik KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
Francisco J Candido Dos ReisDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Salvatore LopezFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea MarianiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mario M LeitaoGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Francesco RaspagliesiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Pieluigi Benedetti PaniciDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Violante Di DonatoDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Ludovico MuziiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Nicoletta ColomboGynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Sandro PignataDepartment of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale Napoli, Italy.
Bradley J MonkArizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, USA.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITArizona Oncology · USCardiovascular Center Hokkaido Ohno Hospital · JPCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CACentre Léon Bérard · FRCornell University · USEnvironment Canterbury · NZErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITGhent University Hospital · BEIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNational Defense Medical College · JPNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGNiigata University · JPSeoul National University · KRShikoku Cancer Center · JP

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serous endometrial cancer represents a relative rare entity accounting for about 10% of all diagnosed endometrial cancer, but it is responsible for 40% of endometrial cancer-related deaths. Patients with serous endometrial cancer are often diagnosed at earlier disease stage, but remain at higher risk of recurrence and poorer prognosis when compared stage-for-stage with endometrioid subtype endometrial cancer. Serous endometrial cancers are characterized by marked nuclear atypia and abnormal p53 staining in immunohistochemistry. The mainstay of treatment for newly diagnosed serous endometrial cancer includes a multi-modal therapy with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Unfortunately, despite these efforts, survival outcomes still remain poor. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network classified all endometrial cancer types into four categories, of which, serous endometrial cancer mostly is found within the "copy number high" group. This group is characterized by the increased cell cycle deregulation (e.g., CCNE1, MYC, PPP2R1A, PIKCA, ERBB2 and CDKN2A) and TP53 mutations (90%). To date, the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is an effective treatment modality in second-line therapy, with a response rate of 50% in advanced/recurrent serous endometrial cancer. Owing to the unfavorable outcomes of serous endometrial cancer, clinical trials are a priority. At present, ongoing studies are testing novel combinations of various targeted and immunotherapeutic agents in newly diagnosed and advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer - an important strategy for serous endometrial cancer, whereby tumors are usually p53+ and pMMR, making response to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy unlikely. Here, the rare tumor working group (including members from the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO), Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG), and Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG)), performed a narrative review reporting on the current landscape of serous endometrial cancer and focusing on standard and emerging therapeutic options for patients affected by this difficult disease.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUterine NeoplasmsEndometrial cancerImmunotherapySerous uterine cancerTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID33934848
PMCPMC9445918
OpenAlexW3158705568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.