Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33934710›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2021

Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with cervical artery dissection and stroke in the anterior or posterior circulation - a multicenter analysis from the German Stroke Registry.

Ludwig Schlemm, Regina von Rennenberg, Eberhard Siebert, Georg Bohner, Fabian Flottmann, Gabor C Petzold, Götz Thomalla, Matthias Endres, Christian H Nolte, GSR-ET investigators

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TREAT-AIS: A Multicenter National Registry.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cervical Artery Dissections: Etiopathogenesis and Management.Vascular health and risk management · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ludwig SchlemmKlinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4165-2366
Regina von RennenbergKlinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eberhard SiebertBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Georg BohnerBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Fabian FlottmannUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neuroradiologische Diagnostik und Intervention, Martinistr 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Gabor C PetzoldGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Götz ThomallaUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Matthias EndresKlinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian H NolteKlinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. christian.nolte@charite.de.
GSR-ET investigators
Universität Hamburg · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical artery dissection (CAD) is a rare cause of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and may constitute a challenge for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We compared procedural characteristics, reperfusion rates, and clinical outcome in AIS patients undergoing MT with and without CAD.

methodsWe performed a pre-specified analysis of patients registered within the German Stroke Registry, a prospectively maintained multicenter registry of consecutive patients with AIS patients treated by MT. Procedural characteristics included time periods and additional application of medication.

resultsOf 2589 patients, 62 (2.4%) were diagnosed with CAD. CAD patients were younger, had lower rates of known vascular risk factors and larger baseline stroke volumes. MT in CAD patients took significantly longer (median [IQR] groin-puncture-to-flow restoration time: 98 [67-136] versus 70 [45-100] minutes; p < 0.001) and more often required use of intra-arterial medication (34.4% versus 15.6%; p < 0.001). Reperfusion success (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3: 85.2% versus 83.3%, p = 0.690) and favorable functional outcome after 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2: 70.9% versus 36.4%, adjusted p = 0.086) did not differ significantly between patients with and without CAD. The latter findings held true for both CAD in the anterior and posterior circulation.

conclusionCAD in AIS requiring MT is rare. MT in patients with CAD constitutes a particular procedural challenge, but still achieves favorable radiological and functional outcomes in most patients. Our data provide indirect evidence that MT is of clinical benefit in patients with AIS due to LVO and CAD.

Indexed as

Acute therapyDissectionIschemic strokeMechanical thrombectomyRegistry

Identifiers

PMID33934710
PMCPMC8091690
OpenAlexW3157790617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.