ArticleCancer medicine2021
Comprehensive mutational analysis of background mucosa in patients with Lugol-voiding lesions.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Somatic mutations including the background mucosa in patients with Lugol-voiding lesions (LVLs) are still not well known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the somatic mutations of the background mucosa in patients with LVLs (Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), and hyperplasia). Twenty-five patients with LVLs (9 with SCC, 6 with IN, and 10 with hyperplasia) were included. A targeted sequence was performed for LVLs and background mucosa using an esophageal cancer panel. Each mutation was checked whether it was oncogenic or not concerning OncoKB. In LVLs, TP53 was the most dominant mutation (80%). Furthermore, 72% of TP53 mutations was putative drivers. In background mucosa, NOTCH1 was the most dominant mutation (88%) and TP53 was the second most dominant mutation (48%). Furthermore, 73% of TP53 mutations and 8% of NOTCH1 mutations were putative drivers. Putative driver mutations of TP53 had significantly higher allele frequency (AF) in SCC than in IN and hyperplasia. Conversely, putative driver mutations of NOTCH1 did not have a significant accumulation of AF in the progression of carcinogenesis. Furthermore, in SCC, AF of TP53 mutations was significantly higher in LVLs than in background mucosa, but not in IN and hyperplasia. Regarding NOTCH1, a significant difference was not observed between LVLs and background mucosa in each group. The background mucosa in patients with LVLs already had putative driver mutations such as TP53 and NOTCH1. Of these two genes, TP53 mutation could be the main target gene of carcinogenesis in esophageal SCC. Clinical Trials registry: UMIN000034247.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.