Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33934475›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cosmetic dermatology2021

A novel azelaic acid formulation for the topical treatment of inflammatory rosacea: A multicentre, prospective clinical trial.

Federica Dall'Oglio, Aurora Tedeschi, Francesco Lacarrubba, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Nevena Skroza, Paolo Chiodini, Giuseppe Micali

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Latest Advances in Rosacea Treatment: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Azelaic Acid: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Applications.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Review
  5. Rosacea: Practical Guidance and Challenges for Clinical Management.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Federica Dall'OglioDermatology Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Aurora TedeschiDermatology Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesco LacarrubbaDermatology Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Gabriella FabbrociniSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Nevena SkrozaDermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.
Paolo ChiodiniMedical Statistics Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe MicaliDermatology Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopical azelaic acid (AzA) is a common treatment for mild/moderate inflammatory rosacea.

aimsTo assess the efficacy and tolerability of a novel formulation cream containing 15% AzA (anti-inflammatory/anti-oxidant/anti-microbial agent) combined with 1% dihydroavenanthramide D (anti-inflammatory/anti-itch) in inflammatory rosacea using clinical/instrumental evaluation.

methodsIn this multicentre, prospective, open-label trial, 45 patients with mild/moderate inflammatory rosacea enrolled at the Dermatology Clinic of the University of Catania, Naples, and Rome (Italy) were instructed to apply the cream twice daily for 8 weeks. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline (T0) and at 8 weeks (T1) by (1) Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score based on a 5-point scale (from 0 = clear/no erythema/papules/pustules to 4 = severe erythema/several papules/pustules) and (2) inflammatory lesions count. Instrumental evaluation of erythema degree was performed by erythema-directed digital photography (EDDP) by a 5-point scale (from 0 = no redness to 4 = severe redness) at all time points. Tolerability was assessed by a self-administered questionnaire at 8 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.

resultsForty-four patients completed the study. At week 8, a significant decrease in baseline of IGA scores [median from 3 (T0) to 1 (T1)] and inflammatory lesions count [median from 8 (T0) to 1 (T1)] was recorded along with a significant reduction of erythema scores [median from 2 (T0) to 1 (T1)]. No relevant side effects were recorded.

conclusionsOur results suggest that this new non-irritating product represents a valid therapeutic option for mild/moderate inflammatory rosacea, and EDDP is able to provide a more defined evaluation of erythema changes.

Indexed as

Dermatologic AgentsRosaceaDicarboxylic AcidsHumansProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomeazelaic acidDermatologic AgentsDicarboxylic Acidsazelaic acidrosaceatopical treatments

Identifiers

PMID33934475
PMCPMC8252084
OpenAlexW3157992194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.