ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022
Comparison of a modified Story approach to traditional evaluation of acid-base disturbances in patients with shock: a cohort study.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the Gaps: Machine Learning Models for Unmeasured Ions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A simplified physicochemical approach to acid-base disorders: perioperative practical application.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare whether the diagnostic evaluation of metabolic acidosis can be improved by using a modified Story method compared to the traditional evaluation in a population of critically ill patients with shock. This prospective cohort study included shock patients admitted to the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Brazil between May 2018 and November 2019. We collected laboratory data necessary for traditional evaluation and the simplified Stewart's method. During the study period, 149 patients were included in the final analysis. Of the 17 patients with a normal SBE and AG
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.