Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33934230›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2021

Is there a correlation between HER2 gene amplification level and response to neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer?

Silvia Antolín, Lucía García-Caballero, Cristina Reboredo, Aurea Molina, Joaquín Mosquera, Ángel Vázquez-Boquete, Rosalía Gallego, Mari Paz Santiago, Ángel Concha, Eva Pérez and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Kv10.1 Channel: A Promising Target in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia AntolínDepartment of Medical Oncology, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0110-3349
Lucía García-CaballeroDepartment of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. lucia.garcia.caballero@usc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0116-1263
Cristina ReboredoDepartment of Medical Oncology, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain.
Aurea MolinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain.
Joaquín MosqueraDepartment of Medical Oncology, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain.
Ángel Vázquez-BoqueteDepartment of Pathology, Santiago de Compostela University Hospital Complex, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Rosalía GallegoDepartment of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Mari Paz SantiagoDepartment of Pathology, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain.
Ángel ConchaDepartment of Pathology, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain.
Eva PérezDepartment of Medical Oncology, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-7626
Lourdes CalvoDepartment of Medical Oncology, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-0241
Tomás García-CaballeroDepartment of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7938-1437
Universidade da Coruña · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are contradictory data regarding the correlation between HER2 amplification level determined by in situ hybridization and evolution after treatment with anti-HER2 therapies. The aim of this study was to correlate quantitative results of FISH (ratio HER2/CEP17 and number of HER2 signals/nucleus) with pathological response achieved after neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy. For this purpose, we analysed 100 consecutive HER2-positive cases of breast carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy. HER2 amplification determined by FISH was found in 92 of the 100 cases studied. pCR was obtained in 58% of the patients whose tumours presented amplification. In contrast, no pCR was obtained in the 8 patients with non-amplified tumours. A significant direct correlation between HER2 high amplification (HER2/CEP17 ratio > 5 or HER2 signals/nucleus > 10) and pCR was found. In conclusion, HER2 amplification levels are clinically relevant because they provide oncologists with valuable information on the possibilities of achieving pCR after neoadjuvant treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, PharmacologicalBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, PharmacologicalERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumabBreast cancerFISHHER2 amplificationNeoadjuvant therapyPathological complete responseTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID33934230
OpenAlexW3158561066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.