Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33934220›Full record

Trial reportMedical molecular morphology2021

Pathological processes and pretreatment cytologic diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium: addendum report of the Kansai Clinical Oncology Group/Intergroup study in Japan.

Harunobu Matsumoto, Kaei Nasu, Ayumi Shikama, Takaya Shiozaki, Masayuki Futagami, Kentaro Kai, Taisuke Mori, Mitsutake Yano, Takashi Yamada, Norihiro Teramoto

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical molecular morphology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Harunobu MatsumotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu-shi, Oita, 8795593, Japan. matumoti@oita-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-1585
Kaei NasuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu-shi, Oita, 8795593, Japan.
Ayumi ShikamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, Japan.
Takaya ShiozakiDivision of Gynecology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi-shi, Hyogo, Japan.
Masayuki FutagamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki-shi, Aomori, Japan.
Kentaro KaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Yufu-shi, Oita, 8795593, Japan.
Taisuke MoriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan.
Mitsutake YanoDivision of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka-shi, Saitama, Japan.
Takashi YamadaDepartment of Pathology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, Japan.
Norihiro TeramotoDivision of Pathology, Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama-shi, Ehime, Japan.
Oita University · JPHirosaki University · JPHyogo Prefectural Cancer Center · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPSaitama Medical University · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A previous retrospective study of a neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium including 42 cases employed a central pathologic review to ensure the reliability of the findings. However, the pathological processes were not described in detail. In this study, we further analyzed these processes and the results of pretreatment endometrial cytology of neuroendocrine carcinoma. Of the 65 patients from 18 institutions registered in the study, 42 (64.6%) were diagnosed with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium based on the central pathological review. Thirteen of the 23 excluded cases conflicted from their original diagnoses: 5 (38.5%) were diagnosed with endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 5 (38.5%) with undifferentiated carcinoma, and 3 (23.1%) with carcinosarcoma. Immunohistochemical staining led to a change in diagnosis for 8 (61.5%) of the 13 cases. Pretreatment endometrial cytology was examined in 38 (90.5%) cases; 34 (89.5%) of these 38 cases were found, or suspected, to be positive. To ensure the selection of appropriate therapy and keeping patients correctly informed, it is important to distinguish neuroendocrine carcinoma from other similar histologic types. Endometrial cytology may help in the early detection of this disease.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, EndometrioidCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineCarcinosarcomaEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansJapanMedical OncologyEndometrial neoplasmLarge cell carcinomaNeuroendocrine carcinomaPathological processSmall cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33934220
OpenAlexW3157102098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.