Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33934212›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2022

Paraneoplastic vs. non-paraneoplastic anti-Hu associated dysmotility: a case series and literature review.

Simone Rossi, Elena Merli, Rita Rinaldi, Gaia Deleonardi, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Anna Simona Sasdelli, Alessandro Di Federico, Maria Guarino, Vincenzo Donadio, Loris Pironi and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Late Onset of Pseudoachalasia in Anti-Hu-Associated Syndrome.Case reports in gastrointestinal medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simone Rossi *IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Elena Merli *IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rita RinaldiIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Gaia DeleonardiMetropolitan Laboratory, Department of Immunology, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vincenzo MastrangeloIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna Simona SasdelliClinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit-Centre for Chronic Intestinal Failure, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro Di FedericoMedical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maria GuarinoIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vincenzo DonadioIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Loris PironiClinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit-Centre for Chronic Intestinal Failure, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco GelsominoMedical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Roberto De Giorgio *Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Roberto D'Angelo *IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. roberto.dangelo@aosp.bo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-8074
Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis work aimed to report the demographic and clinical characteristics of two new cases with non-paraneoplastic anti-Hu-associated gut motility impairment, and perform a thorough revision covering anti-Hu-associated paraneoplastic (PGID) and non-paraneoplastic (nPGID) gastrointestinal dysmotility.

backgroundSeveral case series have clearly established a relationship between certain type of cancers, the development of circulating anti-Hu antibodies, and the concomitant usually severe gastrointestinal dysmotility; in contrast, a few studies focused on anti-Hu-associated nPGID.

methodsWe searched for studies regarding anti-Hu-associated gastrointestinal manifestations and extracted data concerning clinical characteristics of patients, including specific demographic, oncological, neurological, gastrointestinal, histological, and treatment response features.

resultsForty-nine articles with a total of 59 cases of anti-Hu-associated gastrointestinal dysmotility were analyzed. The patients' age at symptom onset significantly differed between PGID and nPGID (median 61 vs 31 years, p < 0.001). Most cancers (95%) in PGID were detected within 24 months from the beginning of gastrointestinal symptoms. The impairment of gastrointestinal motility was generalized (i.e., involving the whole gut) in 59.3% of patients, with no significant differences between PGID vs nPGID group. nPGID patients showed a better response to immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatment and a longer life expectancy.

conclusionsAnti-Hu-associated gastrointestinal dysmotility covers a wide clinical spectrum. Patients with otherwise unexplained gastrointestinal dysmotility, especially when associated with other neurological symptoms, should be tested for anti-Hu antibodies regardless age of onset and disease duration. Compared to PGID, nPGID occurs in younger patients with a long duration of disease.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal DiseasesNeoplasmsParaneoplastic SyndromesAutoantibodiesELAV ProteinsGastrointestinal MotilityHumansMiddle AgedAutoantibodiesELAV ProteinsANNA-1DysmotilityParaneoplasticPseudo-obstructionSCLC

Identifiers

PMID33934212
OpenAlexW3159240608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.