ArticleArchives of toxicology2021
Ensemble machine learning to evaluate the in vivo acute oral toxicity and in vitro human acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of organophosphates.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- PPAOT predictor: ARKA-RASTR strategy-driven rodent acute oral toxicity prediction for pyrazole and pyrrolidine scaffolds-based chemicals with intelligent mechanistic interpretation.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Assessment of the rat acute oral toxicity of quinoline-based pharmaceutical scaffold molecules using QSTR, q-RASTR and machine learning methods.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- A-agents, misleadingly known as "Novichoks": a narrative review.Archives of toxicology · 2023Review
- Discovering the Active Ingredients of Medicine and Food Homologous Substances for Inhibiting the Cyclooxygenase-2 Metabolic Pathway by Machine Learning Algorithms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Application of toxicology in silico methods for prediction of acute toxicity (LDArchives of toxicology · 2023Article
- Comparing LDJournal of chemical health & safety · 2023Article
- Recent research on Novichok.Archives of toxicology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organophosphates (OPs) are hazardous chemicals widely used in industry and agriculture. Distribution of their residues in nature causes serious risks to humans, animals, and plants. To reduce hazards from OPs, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting their acute oral toxicity in rats and mice and inhibition constants concerning human acetylcholinesterase were developed according to the bioactivity data of 456 unique OPs. Based on robust, two-dimensional molecular descriptors and quantum chemical descriptors, which accurately reflect OP electronic structures and reactivities, the influences of eight machine-learning algorithms on the prediction performance of the QSAR models were explored, and consensus QSAR models were constructed. Several strict model validation indices and the results of applicability domain evaluations show that the established consensus QSAR models exhibit good robustness, practical prediction abilities, and wide application scopes. Poor correlation was observed between acute oral toxicity at the mammalian level and the inhibition constants at the molecular level, indicating that the acute toxicity of OPs cannot be evaluated only by the experimental data of enzyme inhibitory activity, their toxicokinetic characteristics must also be considered. The constructed QSAR models described herein provide rapid, theoretical assessment of the bioactivity of unstudied or unknown OPs, as well as guidance for making decisions regarding their regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.