Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33933694›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2021

Conformationally flexible core-bearing detergents with a hydrophobic or hydrophilic pendant: Effect of pendant polarity on detergent conformation and membrane protein stability.

Aiman Sadaf, Seonghoon Kim, Hyoung Eun Bae, Haoqing Wang, Andreas Nygaard, Yuki Uegaki, Yang Du, Chastine F Munk, Satoshi Katsube, Hyun Sung Lee and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CHARMM-GUIJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Aiman SadafDepartment of Bionano Engineering, Center for Bionano Intelligence Education and Research, Hanyang University, Ansan 155-88, South Korea.
Seonghoon KimSchool of Computational Sciences, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul 02455, South Korea.
Hyoung Eun BaeDepartment of Bionano Engineering, Center for Bionano Intelligence Education and Research, Hanyang University, Ansan 155-88, South Korea.
Haoqing WangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.
Andreas NygaardDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2200, Denmark.
Yuki UegakiDepartment of Cell Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Center for Membrane Protein Research, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA.
Yang DuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.
Chastine F MunkDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2200, Denmark.
Satoshi KatsubeDepartment of Cell Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Center for Membrane Protein Research, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA.
Hyun Sung LeeDepartment of Bionano Engineering, Center for Bionano Intelligence Education and Research, Hanyang University, Ansan 155-88, South Korea.
Jungnam BaeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Chul Won ChoiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Hee-Jung ChoiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Bernadette ByrneDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Samuel H GellmanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.
Lan GuanDepartment of Cell Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Center for Membrane Protein Research, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA.
Claus J LolandDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2200, Denmark.
Brian K KobilkaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.
Wonpil ImDepartment of Biological Sciences, Chemistry, and Bioengineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.
Pil Seok ChaeDepartment of Bionano Engineering, Center for Bionano Intelligence Education and Research, Hanyang University, Ansan 155-88, South Korea. Electronic address: pchae@hanyang.ac.kr.
Hanyang University · KRSeoul National University · KRStanford University · USTexas Tech University · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKImperial College London · GBKorea Institute for Advanced Study · KRLehigh University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Integrated approaches to symport mechanisms of membrane transportersR01GM122759 · NIGMS · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI GUAN, LAN · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
Recombinant expression and functional characterization of a lysophosphatidylcholine transporterR21NS105863 · NINDS · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI GUAN, LAN · 2018 to 2019
$421k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122759NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS105863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane protein structures provide atomic level insight into essential biochemical processes and facilitate protein structure-based drug design. However, the inherent instability of these bio-macromolecules outside lipid bilayers hampers their structural and functional study. Detergent micelles can be used to solubilize and stabilize these membrane-inserted proteins in aqueous solution, thereby enabling their downstream characterizations. Membrane proteins encapsulated in detergent micelles tend to denature and aggregate over time, highlighting the need for development of new amphiphiles effective for protein solubility and stability. In this work, we present newly-designed maltoside detergents containing a pendant chain attached to a glycerol-decorated tris(hydroxymethyl)methane (THM) core, designated GTMs. One set of the GTMs has a hydrophobic pendant (ethyl chain; E-GTMs), and the other set has a hydrophilic pendant (methoxyethoxylmethyl chain; M-GTMs) placed in the hydrophobic-hydrophilic interfaces. The two sets of GTMs displayed profoundly different behaviors in terms of detergent self-assembly and protein stabilization efficacy. These behaviors mainly arise from the polarity difference between two pendants (ethyl and methoxyethoxylmethyl chains) that results in a large variation in detergent conformation between these sets of GTMs in aqueous media. The resulting high hydrophobic density in the detergent micelle interior is likely responsible for enhanced efficacy of the M-GTMs for protein stabilization compared to the E-GTMs and a gold standard detergent DDM. A representative GTM, M-GTM-O12, was more effective for protein stability than some recently developed detergents including LMNG. This is the first case study investigating the effect of pendant polarity on detergent geometry correlated with detergent efficacy for protein stabilization. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This study introduces new amphiphiles for use as biochemical tools in membrane protein studies. We identified a few hydrophilic pendant-bearing amphiphiles such as M-GTM-O11 and M-GTM-O12 that show remarkable efficacy for membrane protein solubilization and stabilization compared to a gold standard DDM, the hydrophobic counterparts (E-GTMs) and a significantly optimized detergent LMNG. In addition, detergent results obtained in the current study reveals the effect of detergent pendant polarity on protein solubility and stability. Thus, the current study represents both significant chemical and conceptual advance. The detergent tools and design principle introduced here advance protein science and facilitate structure-based drug design and development.

Indexed as

DetergentsMembrane ProteinsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMicellesMolecular ConformationProtein StabilitySolubilityDetergentsMembrane ProteinsMicellesAmphiphile designDetergent conformationMembrane proteinsPendant polarityProtein stabilization

Identifiers

PMID33933694
PMCPMC8222176
OpenAlexW3157450817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.