Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33933233›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2021

Minimizing Population Health Loss in Times of Scarce Surgical Capacity During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Crisis and Beyond: A Modeling Study.

Benjamin Gravesteijn, Eline Krijkamp, Jan Busschbach, Geert Geleijnse, Isabel Retel Helmrich, Sophie Bruinsma, Céline van Lint, Ernest van Veen, Ewout Steyerberg, Kees Verhoef and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling Health Effects of Alternative Treatment Options during Surgical Delay to Inform Prioritization of Surgical Care.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Surgical prioritization based on decision model outcomes is not sensitive to differences between the health-related quality of life values estimates of physicians and citizens.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Health Economics of Interventions to Tackle the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Benjamin GravesteijnDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eline KrijkampDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Netherlands Institute for Health Sciences, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.krijkamp@erasmusmc.nl.
Jan BusschbachDepartment of Medical Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Netherlands Institute for Health Sciences, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert GeleijnseDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Isabel Retel HelmrichDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sophie BruinsmaDepartment of Quality and Patient Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Céline van LintDepartment of Quality and Patient Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ernest van VeenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewout SteyerbergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Biostatistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kees VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan van SaaseDepartment of Internal Medicine - Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hester LingsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob Baatenburg de JongDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Value Based Operation Room Triage team collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCoronavirus disease 2019 has put unprecedented pressure on healthcare systems worldwide, leading to a reduction of the available healthcare capacity. Our objective was to develop a decision model to estimate the impact of postponing semielective surgical procedures on health, to support prioritization of care from a utilitarian perspective.

methodsA cohort state-transition model was developed and applied to 43 semielective nonpediatric surgical procedures commonly performed in academic hospitals. Scenarios of delaying surgery from 2 weeks were compared with delaying up to 1 year and no surgery at all. Model parameters were based on registries, scientific literature, and the World Health Organization Global Burden of Disease study. For each surgical procedure, the model estimated the average expected disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) per month of delay.

resultsGiven the best available evidence, the 2 surgical procedures associated with most DALYs owing to delay were bypass surgery for Fontaine III/IV peripheral arterial disease (0.23 DALY/month, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.36) and transaortic valve implantation (0.15 DALY/month, 95% CI: 0.09-0.24). The 2 surgical procedures with the least DALYs were placing a shunt for dialysis (0.01, 95% CI: 0.005-0.01) and thyroid carcinoma resection (0.01, 95% CI: 0.01-0.02).

conclusionExpected health loss owing to surgical delay can be objectively calculated with our decision model based on best available evidence, which can guide prioritization of surgical procedures to minimize population health loss in times of scarcity. The model results should be placed in the context of different ethical perspectives and combined with capacity management tools to facilitate large-scale implementation.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCohort StudiesCOVID-19Global Burden of DiseaseHumansLife ExpectancyPopulation HealthProbability TheoryQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSurge CapacityCOVID-19healthcare planningpopulation healthprioritizationsimulation modelsurgery delay

Identifiers

PMID33933233
PMCPMC7933792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.