SynthesisBMC health services research2021
Hospital contextual factors affecting the implementation of health technologies: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resource allocation efficiency in Ethiopian hospitals: technology utilization as mediator and staff competency as moderator.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- End-user perspectives on design and implementation of a novel SkinScan3D (SS3D) device for monitoring Kaposi Sarcoma in East Africa: a qualitative study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The role of virtual reality in enhancing informed consent for shockwave lithotripsy: A mixed-methods study of physician and patient perspectives.Asian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Building bridges in diabetic foot ulcer care: a realist evaluation of the cross-sectoral use of telemedicine solutions.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Healthcare Professionals' Descriptions of Contextual Factors Affecting Complex Aortic Surgical Care: A Secondary Analysis Using the Fundamentals of Care Framework.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Acceptance of Electronic Medical Records Among Practitioner Nurses and Nurse Managers Using the UTAUT Framework in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Implementation of Ambient AI Scribes in Hospitals: Lessons for Healthcare Leadership, Governance, and Change Management.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
- Organizational Readiness for Change in the Era of Smart Hospital Wards: Qualitative Study of Health Care Workers' Insights.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Contextual factors in value-based decision support to enhance health technologies adoption: the case of biosimilars.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Contributors to Electronic Health Record-Integrated Secure Messaging Use: A Study of Over 33,000 Health Care Professionals.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- Long-Acting Injectable Antiretrovirals for HIV Treatment: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Clinic-Level Barriers to Implementation in the United States.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2024Article
- Addressing complexity when developing an education program for the implementation of a stroke Electronic Medical Record (EMR) enhancement.BMC health services research · 2023Review
- Expectation of clinical decision support systems: a survey study among nephrologist end-users.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Opportunities and Barriers to Rural Telerobotic Surgical Health Care in 2021: Report and Research Agenda from a Stakeholder Workshop.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022Article
- "Long COVID" results after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo keep a high quality of assistance it is important for hospitals to invest in health technologies (HTs) that have the potential of improving health outcomes. Even though guidance exists on how HTs should be introduced, used and dismissed, there is a surprising gap in literature concerning the awareness of hospitals in the actual utilization of HTs.
methodsWe performed a systematic literature review of qualitative and quantitative studies aimed at investigating hospital contextual factors that influence the actual utilization of HTs. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Econlit and Ovid Medline electronic databases were searched to retrieve articles published in English and Italian from January 2000 to January 2019. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative studies, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the cross-sectional studies and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for mixed method studies.
resultsWe included 33 articles, which were of moderate to high methodological quality. The included articles mostly addressed the contextual factors that impact the implementation of information and communication technologies (ICTs). Overall, for all HTs, the hospital contextual factors were part of four categories: hospital infrastructure, human resource management, financial resources and leadership styles.
conclusionOur systematic review reported that the contextual factors influencing the HTs utilization at hospital level are mainly explored for ICTs. Several factors should be considered when planning the implementation of a new HTs at hospital level. A potential publication bias might be present in our work, since we included articles published only in English and Italian Language, from January 2000 to January 2019. There remains a gap in the literature on the facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation and concrete utilization of medical and surgical HTs, suggesting the need for further studies for a better understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.