Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33932979›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Tamock: simulation of habitat-specific benchmark data in metagenomics.

Samuel M Gerner, Alexandra B Graf, Thomas Rattei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel M GernerDivision of Computational System Biology, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra B GrafDepartment Bioengineering, University of Applied Sciences FH Campus Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas RatteiDivision of Computational System Biology, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. thomas.rattei@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0592-7791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulated metagenomic reads are widely used to benchmark software and workflows for metagenome interpretation. The results of metagenomic benchmarks depend on the assumptions about their underlying ecosystems. Conclusions from benchmark studies are therefore limited to the ecosystems they mimic. Ideally, simulations are therefore based on genomes, which resemble particular metagenomic communities realistically.

resultsWe developed Tamock to facilitate the realistic simulation of metagenomic reads according to a metagenomic community, based on real sequence data. Benchmarks samples can be created from all genomes and taxonomic domains present in NCBI RefSeq. Tamock automatically determines taxonomic profiles from shotgun sequence data, selects reference genomes accordingly and uses them to simulate metagenomic reads. We present an example use case for Tamock by assessing assembly and binning method performance for selected microbiomes.

conclusionsTamock facilitates automated simulation of habitat-specific benchmark metagenomic data based on real sequence data and is implemented as a user-friendly command-line application, providing extensive additional information along with the simulated benchmark data. Resulting benchmarks enable an assessment of computational methods, workflows, and parameters specifically for a metagenomic habitat or ecosystem of a metagenomic study. AVAILABILITY: Source code, documentation and install instructions are freely available at GitHub ( https://github.com/gerners/tamock ).

Indexed as

MetagenomicsAlgorithmsMetagenomeSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareBenchmarkMetagenomicsSimulationStudy design

Identifiers

PMID33932979
PMCPMC8088724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.