Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33932581›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2021

Effect of different preconditioning protocols on the viscoelastic inflation response of the posterior sclera.

Gianfranco Bianco, Alexander M Levy, Rafael Grytz, Massimo A Fazio

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biomechanical Correlations Between the Cornea and the Optic Nerve Head.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Quasi-linear viscoelastic behavior of fresh porcine ureter.International urology and nephrology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gianfranco BiancoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA. Electronic address: gbianco@uabmc.edu.
Alexander M LevyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA.
Rafael GrytzDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA.
Massimo A FazioDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital · US

Funding

Visual Phenotyping CoreP30EY003039 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LAWRENCE C SINCICH · 1985 to 2026
$16.9M
Scleral Remodeling in MyopiaR01EY026588 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Rafael Grytz · 2016 to 2026
$4.1M
The influence of ocular remodeling on glaucomaR01EY027759 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GRYTZ, RAFAEL, SAMUELS, BRIAN CHRISTOPHER · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003039NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026588NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preconditioning by repeated cyclic loads is routinely used in ex vivo mechanical testing of soft biological tissues. The goal of preconditioning is to achieve a steady and repeatable mechanical response and to measure material properties that are representative of the in vivo condition. Preconditioning protocols vary across studies, and their effect on the viscoelastic response of tested soft tissue is typically not reported or analyzed. We propose a methodology to systematically analyze the preconditioning process with application to inflation testing. We investigated the effect of preconditioning on the viscoelastic inflation response of tree shrew posterior sclera using two preconditioning protocols: (i) continuous cyclic loading-unloading without rest and (ii) cyclic loading-unloading with 15-min rest between cycles. Posterior scleral surface strain was measured using three-dimensional Digital Image Correlation (3D-DIC). We used five variables of characterizing features of the stress-strain loop curve to compare the two preconditioning protocols. Our results showed protocol-dependent differences in the tissue response during preconditioning and at the preconditioned state. Incorporating a resting time between preconditioning cycles significantly decreased the number of cycles (10.5 ± 2.9 cycles vs. 3.1 ± 0.5 cycles, p < 0.001) but increased the total time (15.8 ± 4.4 min vs. 51.2 ± 8.3 min, p < 0.001) needed to reach preconditioned state. At the preconditioned state, 2 of 5 characteristic variables differed significantly between protocols: hysteresis loop area (difference=0.023 kJ/m

Indexed as

ScleraBiomechanical PhenomenaElasticityStress, Mechanical3D Digital Image CorrelationInflation testingMechanical characterizationPreconditioningSclera biomechanics

Identifiers

PMID33932581
PMCPMC8549436
OpenAlexW3158597884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.