ArticleBiophysical journal2021
Quantitative interpretation of cell rolling velocity distribution.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of leukocyte adhesion on partitioning of healthy and diabetic red blood cells at vascular bifurcations.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Let's Get Rolling: Precise Control of Microfluidic Assay Conditions to Recapitulate Selectin-Mediated Rolling Interactions of the Leukocyte Adhesion Cascade.Current protocols · 2024Article
- The effect of type-2 diabetes conditions on neutrophil rolling adhesion.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Quantification of fast molecular adhesion by fluorescence footprinting.Science advances · 2021Article
- Estimation of rolling work of adhesion at the nanoscale with soft probing using optical tweezers.RSC advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leukocyte rolling adhesion, facilitated by selectin-mediated interactions, is a highly dynamic process in which cells roll along the endothelial surface of blood vessel walls to reach the site of infection. The most common approach to investigate cell-substrate adhesion is to analyze the cell rolling velocity in response to shear stress changes. It is assumed that changes in rolling velocity indicate changes in adhesion strength. In general, cell rolling velocity is studied at the population level as an average velocity corresponding to given shear stress. However, no statistical investigation has been performed on the instantaneous velocity distribution. In this study, we first developed a method to remove systematic noise and revealed the true velocity distribution to exhibit a log-normal profile. We then demonstrated that the log-normal distribution describes the instantaneous velocity at both the population and single-cell levels across the physiological flow rates. The log-normal parameters capture the cell motion more accurately than the mean and median velocities, which are prone to systematic error. Lastly, we connected the velocity distribution to the molecular adhesion force distribution and showed that the slip-bond regime of the catch-slip behavior of the P-selectin/PSGL-1 interaction is responsible for the variation of cell velocity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.