Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33932401›Full record

ArticleContraception2021

Factors associated with successful implementation of telehealth abortion in 4 United States clinical practice settings.

Emily M Godfrey, Anna E Fiastro, Elizabeth A Jacob-Files, Francine M Coeytaux, Elisa S Wells, Molly R Ruben, Sajal S Sanan, Ian M Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Primary Care Clinicians' Interest In, and Barriers To, Medication Abortion.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily M GodfreyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, WA, United States. Electronic address: godfreye@uw.edu.
Anna E FiastroDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, WA, United States.
Elizabeth A Jacob-FilesDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, WA, United States.
Francine M CoeytauxPlan C, c/o National Women's Health Network, Washington, DC, United States.
Elisa S WellsPlan C, c/o National Women's Health Network, Washington, DC, United States.
Molly R RubenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, WA, United States.
Sajal S SananDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, WA, United States.
Ian M BennettDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, WA, United States.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo overcome obstacles to delivering medication abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic, clinics and providers implemented new medication abortion service models not requiring in-person care. This study identifies organizational factors that promoted successful implementation of telehealth and adoption of "no test" medication abortion protocols. STUDY

designWe conducted 21 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with health care providers and clinic administrators implementing clinician-supported telehealth abortion during the COVID pandemic. We selected 15 clinical sites to represent 4 different practice settings: independent primary care practices, online medical services, specialty family planning clinics, and primary care clinics within multispecialty health systems. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided our thematic analysis.

resultsSuccessful implementation of telehealth abortion included access to formal and informal inter-organizational networks, including professional organizations and informal mentorship relationships with innovators in the field; organizational readiness for implementation, such as having clinic resources available for telehealth services like functional electronic health records and options for easy-to-use virtual patient-provider interactions; and motivated and effective clinic champions.

conclusionsIn response to the need to offer remote clinical services, 4 different practice settings types leveraged key operational factors to facilitate successful implementation of telehealth abortion. Information from this study can inform implementation strategies to support the dissemination and adoption of this model. IMPLICATIONS: Examples of successfully implemented telehealth medication abortion services provide a framework that can be used to inform and implement similar patient-centered telehealth models in diverse practice settings.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAbortifacient AgentsAbortion, InducedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCOVID-19Electronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansImplementation ScienceOrganizational InnovationPatient ParticipationPregnancyPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineUnited StatesAbortifacient AgentsAbortionImplementationMedication abortionQualitative studyTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33932401
PMCPMC8542461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.