Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33932311›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Advance care directive prevalence among older Australians and associations with person-level predictors and quality indicators.

Kimberly Buck, Linda Nolte, Marcus Sellars, Craig Sinclair, Ben P White, Helana Kelly, Ashley Macleod, Karen M Detering

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advance care directive prevalence among older Australians and associations with person-level predictors and quality indicators.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly BuckAdvance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia.
Linda NolteAdvance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9869-6824
Marcus SellarsAdvance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia.
Craig SinclairAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ben P WhiteAustralian Centre for Health Research Law, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Helana KellyAdvance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia.
Ashley MacleodAdvance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia.
Karen M DeteringAdvance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia.
Austin Health · AUAustralian National University · AUAustralian Research Council · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) conversations may result in preferences for medical care being documented.

objectiveTo explore the uptake and quality of advance care directives (ACDs) among older Australians accessing health and aged care services, by overall ACP documentation prevalence, person-level predictors and ACD quality indicators. DESIGN AND

settingNational multi-centre health record audit in general practices (GP), hospitals and residential aged care facilities (RACF).

participantsA total of 4187 people aged ≥65 years attending their GP (n = 676), admitted to hospital (n = 1122) or residing in a RACF (n = 2389).

main outcome measuresACP documentation prevalence by setting and type including person-completed ACDs and non-ACD documents (completed by a health professional or someone else); person-level predictors and quality indicators of ACDs.

resultsOverall ACP documentation prevalence was 46.5% (29.2% weighted). ACD prevalence was 25.3% (14.2% weighted). Unweighted ACD prevalence was higher in RACFs (37.7%) than in hospitals (11.1%) and GPs (5.5%). 35.8% of ACP documentation was completed by a health professional (9.7% weighted), and 18.1% was completed by someone else (10.6% weighted). Having an ACD was positively associated with being female, older, having two or more medical conditions, receiving palliative care, being divorced/separated and being in a RACF. Only 73% of ACDs included full name, signature, document date and witnessing. CONCLUSIONS AND CONTRIBUTION: Low ACP documentation prevalence and a lack of accessible, person-completed and quality ACDs represent an important ACP implementation issue. Low prevalence is complicated by poor document quality and a higher prevalence of documents being completed by someone other than the person.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningQuality Indicators, Health CareAustraliaDocumentationFemaleHumansPrevalenceadvance care directiveadvance care planningaged care servicegeneral practicehealth serviceprevalence

Identifiers

PMID33932311
PMCPMC8369087
OpenAlexW3157126023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.