Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33932277›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2020

Potential Benefits and Drawbacks of Virtual Clinics in General Surgery: Pilot Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Emily Rutherford, Roghinio Noray, Caolán Ó hEarráin, Kevin Quinlan, Aisling Hegarty, Lenin Ekpotu, Chinedum Arize, Fiyinfoluwa Fabamwo, Abdulaziz Alrubaiaan, Avinash Bhupalan and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Time, cost and carbon-efficiency: a silver lining of COVID era virtual urology clinics?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Virtual Visits and the Future of No-Shows.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily Rutherford *Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9623-9336
Roghinio Noray *Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4419-7277
Caolán Ó hEarráin *Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1313-9269
Kevin QuinlanDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-0005
Aisling HegartyDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-3334
Lenin EkpotuDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4758-5232
Chinedum ArizeDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1115-1835
Fiyinfoluwa FabamwoDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-8051
Abdulaziz AlrubaiaanDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-1998
Avinash BhupalanDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-1817
Abdulla AlshehhiDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-6855
Colm PowerDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6792-6754
Arnold David Konrad HillDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9617-7983
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEscalating demand for specialist health care puts considerable demand on hospital services. Technology offers a means by which health care providers may increase the efficiency of health care delivery.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to conduct a pilot study of the feasibility, benefits, and drawbacks of a virtual clinic (VC) in the general surgical service of a busy tertiary center.

methodsPatient satisfaction with current care and attitudes to VC were surveyed prospectively in the general surgical outpatient department (OPD; n=223). A subset of patients who had undergone endoscopy and day surgery were recruited to follow-up in a VC and subsequently surveyed with regard to their satisfaction (20/243). Other outcomes measured included a comparison of consultation times in traditional and virtual outpatient settings and financial cost to both patients and the institution.

resultsAlmost half of the patients reported barriers to prospective use of VCs. However, within the cohort who had been followed-up in the VC, satisfaction was higher than the traditional OPD (100% as compared with 187/223, 83.9%). Significant savings in both time (P=.003) and financial costs to patients and the institution were found.

conclusionsFor an appropriately selected group of patients, VCs offer a viable alternative to traditional OPD. This alternative can improve both patient satisfaction and efficiency of patient care.

Indexed as

delivery of health careoutpatient careremote consultationsurgerytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33932277
PMCPMC7728406
OpenAlexW2982337352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.