Trial reportEuropean journal of heart failure2021
Primary results of long-term outcomes in the MOMENTUM 3 pivotal trial and continued access protocol study phase: a study of 2200 HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device implants.
Trial report in European journal of heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02892955 (Multi-Center Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing MCS Therapy With HeartMate 3™ Continued Access Protocol), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-Center Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing MCS Therapy With HeartMate 3™ Continued Access Protocol: Post-Approval Continued Follow-up
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence on Clinical Outcomes and Surgical Approaches.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Cost Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for advanced heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Aspirin and Hemocompatibility After LVAD Implantation in Patients With Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: A Secondary Analysis From the ARIES-HM3 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA cardiology · 2025Trial
- Artifactual declines in durable LVAD utilization among heart transplant candidates: Selection bias in transplant registries.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026Article
- Preoperative predictors of low flow limit controller configuration following HeartMate 3 implantation.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2026Observational
- Clinical differences between destination therapy and bridge-to-transplant left ventricular assist device implantation: a 17-year single-center experience in Japan.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2026Observational
- Incidence of right heart failure and its impact on survival outcomes after implantable left ventricular assist device implantation.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Low rates of inotropic support and durable left ventricular assist device placement among status 2 heart transplant candidates with temporary mechanical circulatory support.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026Article
- Costs and outcomes in Finnish heart failure patients treated with left ventricular assist device or heart transplant.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Heart failure in 2025: new insights, therapies, and clinical directions.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Heart Replacement Therapy in Young Patients: A Comparative Analysis of HeartMate 3 LVAD and Heart Transplant Using MOMENTUM 3 and UNOS Registry.JACC. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of patients implanted with a HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device-a real-world, single-centre, observational study.ESC heart failure · 2026Observational
- Perioperative management of non-cardiac surgery in patients on long-term left ventricular assist device support.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026Article
- From innovation to implementation: expanding global access to mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- SGLT2 inhibitors and outcomes in the chronic Post-LVAD phase: a multicenter real-world cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy: A Peruvian Health Technology Assessment.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2026Article
- Worsening versus advanced heart failure: Management and challenges.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Pharmacological management of major complications following left ventricular assist device implantation in type 2 diabetes mellitus.World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- The Cost of Medical Management in Advanced Heart Failure: A Latin American Perspective.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe MOMENTUM 3 pivotal trial established superiority of the HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD), a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow pump, over the HeartMate II axial-flow pump. We now evaluate HM3 LVAD outcomes in a single-arm prospective continuous access protocol (CAP) post-pivotal trial study. METHODS AND
resultsWe enrolled 2200 HM3 implanted patients (515 pivotal trial and 1685 CAP patients) and compared outcomes including survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device (primary composite endpoint), overall survival and major adverse events at 2 years. The 2-year primary endpoint [76.7% vs. 74.8%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.08, P = 0.21] and overall survival (81.2% vs. 79.0%) were similar among CAP and pivotal cohorts despite sicker patients (more intra-aortic balloon pump use and INTERMACS profile 1) in CAP who were more often intended for destination therapy. Survival was similar between the CAP and pivotal trial in transplant ineligible patients (79.1% vs. 76.7%; adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.16, P = 0.38). In a pooled analysis, the 2-year primary endpoint was similar between INTERMACS profiles 1-2 ('unstable' advanced heart failure), profile 3 ('stable' on inotropic therapy), and profiles 4-7 ('stable' ambulatory advanced heart failure) (75.7% vs. 77.6% vs. 72.9%, respectively). The net burden of adverse events was lower in CAP (adjusted rate ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.98, P = 0.006), with consequent decrease in hospitalization.
conclusionsThe primary results of accumulating HM3 LVAD experience suggest a lower adverse event burden and similar survival compared to the pivotal MOMENTUM 3 trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.