Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33932173›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2021

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of Takayasu arteritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Durga Prasanna Misra, Upendra Rathore, Pallavi Patro, Vikas Agarwal, Aman Sharma

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [News on the treatment of large vessel vasculitis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Durga Prasanna MisraDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), -226014, Lucknow, India. durgapmisra@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5035-7396
Upendra RathoreDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), -226014, Lucknow, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1658-8155
Pallavi PatroSchool of Telemedicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), -226014, Lucknow, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7645-5883
Vikas AgarwalDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), -226014, Lucknow, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4508-1233
Aman SharmaClinical Immunology and Rheumatology Services, Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), -160012, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0813-1243
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research 5/4/1-2/2019-NCD-II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacotherapy of Takayasu arteritis (TAK) with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is an evolving area. A systematic review of Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed Central, clinical trial databases and recent international rheumatology conferences for interventional and observational studies reporting the effectiveness of DMARDs in TAK identified four randomized controlled trials (RCTs, with another longer-term follow-up of one RCT) and 63 observational studies. The identified trials had some concern or high risk of bias. Most observational studies were downgraded on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale due to lack of appropriate comparator groups. Studies used heterogenous outcomes of clinical responses, angiographic stabilization, normalization of inflammatory markers, reduction in vascular uptake on positron emission tomography, reduction in prednisolone doses and relapses. Tocilizumab showed benefit in a RCT compared to placebo in a secondary per-protocol analysis but not the primary intention-to-treat analysis. Abatacept failed to demonstrate benefit compared to placebo for preventing relapses in another RCT. Pooled data from uncontrolled observational studies demonstrated beneficial clinical responses and angiographic stabilization in nearly 80% patients treated with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, tocilizumab or leflunomide. Certainty of evidence for outcomes from RCTs ranged from moderate to very low and was low to very low for all observational studies. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide the pharmacotherapy of TAK. Future observational studies should attempt to include appropriate comparator arms. Multicentric, adequately powered RCTs assessing both clinical and angiographic responses are necessary in TAK.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsTakayasu ArteritisAbataceptAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAbataceptAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsAnti-rheumatic drugsAortoarteritisBiological drugsDisease-modifying systematic reviewMeta-analysisTakayasu arteritis

Identifiers

PMID33932173
PMCPMC8087890
OpenAlexW3157270391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.