Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33932065›Full record

ArticleCancer science2021

Radiological model based on the standard magnetic resonance sequences for detecting methylguanine methyltransferase methylation in glioma using texture analysis.

Wei-Yuan Huang, Ling-Hua Wen, Gang Wu, Pei-Pei Pang, Richard Ogbuji, Chao-Cai Zhang, Feng Chen, Jian-Nong Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multimodal MRI andDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Brain Tumor Imaging: Applications of Artificial Intelligence.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei-Yuan HuangDepartment of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1606-4845
Ling-Hua WenDepartment of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Gang WuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Pei-Pei PangDepartment of Pharmaceuticals Diagnosis, GE Healthcare, Hangzhou, China.
Richard OgbujiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Chao-Cai ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Feng ChenDepartment of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Jian-Nong ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.

Funding

The Key Research and Development Program of Hainan Province ZDYF2019173The Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province 819QN351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to build a radiological model based on standard MR sequences for detecting methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation in gliomas using texture analysis. A retrospective cross-sectional study was undertaken in a cohort of 53 glioma patients who underwent standard preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Conventional visual radiographic features and clinical factors were compared between MGMT promoter methylated and unmethylated groups. Texture analysis extracted the top five most powerful texture features of MR images in each sequence quantitatively for detecting the MGMT promoter methylation status. The radiomic signature (Radscore) was generated by a linear combination of the five features and estimates in each sequence. The combined model based on each Radscore was established using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, nomogram, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the model. No significant differences were observed in any of the visual radiographic features or clinical factors between different MGMT methylated statuses. The top five most powerful features were selected from a total of 396 texture features of T1, contrast-enhanced T1, T2, and T2 FLAIR. Each sequence's Radscore can distinguish MGMT methylated status. A combined model based on Radscores showed differentiation between methylated MGMT and unmethylated MGMT both in the glioblastoma (GBM) dataset as well as the dataset for all other gliomas. The area under the ROC curve values for the combined model was 0.818, with 90.5% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity, in the GBM dataset, and 0.833, with 70.2% sensitivity and 90.6% specificity, in the overall gliomas dataset. Nomogram, calibration, and DCA also validated the performance of the combined model. The combined model based on texture features could be considered as a noninvasive imaging marker for detecting MGMT methylation status in glioma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsContrast MediaCross-Sectional StudiesDecision Support TechniquesDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGlioblastomaGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleContrast MediaDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteinsgliomamagnetic resonance imagingmethylguanine methyltransferasetexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID33932065
PMCPMC8253278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.