Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33932026›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Fully automated quantification method (FQM) of coronary calcium in an anthropomorphic phantom.

Gijs D van Praagh, Niels R van der Werf, Jia Wang, Fasco van Ommen, Keris Poelhekken, Riemer H J A Slart, Dominik Fleischmann, Marcel J W Greuter, Tim Leiner, Martin J Willemink

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantitative aortic Na[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Gijs D van PraaghDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Niels R van der WerfDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jia WangDepartment of Environmental Health and Safety, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Fasco van OmmenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Keris PoelhekkenDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Riemer H J A SlartDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dominik FleischmannDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Marcel J W GreuterDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tim LeinerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martin J WilleminkDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLErasmus MC · NLStanford Health Care · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCoronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a strong predictor for future adverse cardiovascular events. Anthropomorphic phantoms are often used for CAC studies on computed tomography (CT) to allow for evaluation or variation of scanning or reconstruction parameters within or across scanners against a reference standard. This often results in large number of datasets. Manual assessment of these large datasets is time consuming and cumbersome. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a fully automated, open-source quantification method (FQM) for coronary calcium in a standardized phantom. MATERIALS AND

methodsA standard, commercially available anthropomorphic thorax phantom was used with an insert containing nine calcifications with different sizes and densities. To simulate two different patient sizes, an extension ring was used. Image data were acquired with four state-of-the-art CT systems using routine CAC scoring acquisition protocols. For interscan variability, each acquisition was repeated five times with small translations and/or rotations. Vendor-specific CAC scores (Agatston, volume, and mass) were calculated as reference scores using vendor-specific software. Both the international standard CAC quantification methods as well as vendor-specific adjustments were implemented in FQM. Reference and FQM scores were compared using Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficients, risk reclassifications, and Cohen's kappa. Also, robustness of FQM was assessed using varied acquisitions and reconstruction settings and validation on a dynamic phantom. Further, image quality metrics were implemented: noise power spectrum, task transfer function, and contrast- and signal-to-noise ratio among others. Results were validated using imQuest software.

resultsThree parameters in CAC scoring methods varied among the different vendor-specific software packages: the Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold, the minimum area used to designate a group of voxels as calcium, and the usage of isotropic voxels for the volume score. The FQM was in high agreement with vendor-specific scores and ICC's (median [95% CI]) were excellent (1.000 [0.999-1.000] to 1.000 [1.000-1.000]). An excellent interplatform reliability of κ = 0.969 and κ = 0.973 was found. TTF results gave a maximum deviation of 3.8% and NPS results were comparable to imQuest.

conclusionsWe developed a fully automated, open-source, robust method to quantify CAC on CT scans in a commercially available phantom. Also, the automated algorithm contains image quality assessment for fast comparison of differences in acquisition and reconstruction parameters.

Indexed as

CalciumCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsHumansPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedCalciumagatston scoresautomated scoringcomputed tomographycoronary calcium scores

Identifiers

PMID33932026
PMCPMC8360117
OpenAlexW3159044610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.