Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33931833›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2021

Bilayer Scaffolds for Interface Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: A Systematic Reviews.

Sheida Hashemi, Leila Mohammadi Amirabad, Fatemeh Dehghani Nazhvani, Payam Zarrintaj, Hamid Namazi, Abdollah Saadatfar, Ali Golchin

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
36.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheida HashemiSchool of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Leila Mohammadi AmirabadMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA. leila.mohammadi.am@gmail.com.
Fatemeh Dehghani NazhvaniBone and Joint Diseases Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Payam ZarrintajPolymer Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Hamid NamaziBone and Joint Diseases Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abdollah SaadatfarDepartment of urology, Kermanshah University of Medical Science, Kermanshah, Iran.
Ali GolchinDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and Applied Cell Science, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran. agolchin.vet10@yahoo.com.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRIranian Center for Quantum Technologies · IRKermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRMarquette University · USShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUrmia University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis systematic review focus on the application of bilayer scaffolds as an engaging structure for the engineering of multilayered tissues, including vascular and osteochondral tissues, skin, nerve, and urinary bladder. This article provides a concise literature review of different types of bilayer scaffolds to understand their efficacy in targeted tissue engineering.

methodsTo this aim, electronic search in the English language was performed in PMC, NBCI, and PubMed from April 2008 to December 2019 based on the PRISMA guidelines. Animal studies, including the "bilayer scaffold" and at least one of the following items were examined: osteochondral tissue, bone, skin, neural tissue, urinary bladder, vascular system. The articles which didn't include "tissue engineering" and just in vitro studies were excluded.

resultsTotally, 600 articles were evaluated; related articles were 145, and 35 full-text English articles met all the criteria. Fifteen articles in soft tissue engineering and twenty items in hard tissue engineering were the results of this exploration. Based on selected papers, it was revealed that the bilayer scaffolds were used in the regeneration of the multilayered tissues. The highest multilayered tissue regeneration has been achieved when bilayer scaffolds were used with mesenchymal stem cells and differentiation medium before implanting. Among the studies being reported in this review, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are the most studied mesenchymal stem cells. Among different kinds of multilayer tissue, the bilayer scaffold has been most used in osteochondral tissue engineering in which collagen and PLGA have been the most frequently used biomaterials. After osteochondral tissue engineering, bilayer scaffolds were widely used in skin tissue engineering.

conclusionThe current review aimed to manifest the researcher and surgeons to use a more sophisticated bilayer scaffold in combinations of appropriate stem cells, and different can improve multilayer tissue regeneration. This systematic review can pave a way to design a suitable bilayer scaffold for a specific target tissue and conjunction with proper stem cells.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsTissue EngineeringAnimalsCell DifferentiationRegenerative MedicineTissue ScaffoldsInterfaceMultilayered tissuesOsteochondral tissueSkinTissue engineeringTissue engineeringBilayer scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID33931833
OpenAlexW3159404945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.