Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33931726›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Synthetic single cell RNA sequencing data from small pilot studies using deep generative models.

Martin Treppner, Adrián Salas-Bastos, Moritz Hess, Stefan Lenz, Tanja Vogel, Harald Binder

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning based deconvolution methods: A systematic review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin TreppnerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79104, Freiburg, Germany. treppner@imbi.uni-freiburg.de.
Adrián Salas-BastosDepartment of Molecular Embryology, Medical Faculty, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Moritz HessInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Stefan LenzInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Tanja VogelDepartment of Molecular Embryology, Medical Faculty, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Harald BinderInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep generative models, such as variational autoencoders (VAEs) or deep Boltzmann machines (DBMs), can generate an arbitrary number of synthetic observations after being trained on an initial set of samples. This has mainly been investigated for imaging data but could also be useful for single-cell transcriptomics (scRNA-seq). A small pilot study could be used for planning a full-scale experiment by investigating planned analysis strategies on synthetic data with different sample sizes. It is unclear whether synthetic observations generated based on a small scRNA-seq dataset reflect the properties relevant for subsequent data analysis steps. We specifically investigated two deep generative modeling approaches, VAEs and DBMs. First, we considered single-cell variational inference (scVI) in two variants, generating samples from the posterior distribution, the standard approach, or the prior distribution. Second, we propose single-cell deep Boltzmann machines (scDBMs). When considering the similarity of clustering results on synthetic data to ground-truth clustering, we find that the [Formula: see text] variant resulted in high variability, most likely due to amplifying artifacts of small datasets. All approaches showed mixed results for cell types with different abundance by overrepresenting highly abundant cell types and missing less abundant cell types. With increasing pilot dataset sizes, the proportions of the cells in each cluster became more similar to that of ground-truth data. We also showed that all approaches learn the univariate distribution of most genes, but problems occurred with bimodality. Across all analyses, in comparing 10[Formula: see text] Genomics and Smart-seq2 technologies, we could show that for 10[Formula: see text] datasets, which have higher sparsity, it is more challenging to make inference from small to larger datasets. Overall, the results show that generative deep learning approaches might be valuable for supporting the design of scRNA-seq experiments.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID33931726
PMCPMC8087667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.