ArticleScientific reports2021
Variation in the concentration and regional distribution of magnetic nanoparticles in human brains, with and without Alzheimer's disease, from the UK.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic dipole imaging of magnetite nanoparticles in brain tissue.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Micro- and nanoplastics influences in Parkinson's disease: lessons from human stem cell models.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Are "Clean" Days Really Clean? Single Particle Elemental Signatures of PMEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles in the brain connected to alcohol-associated liver disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- On the origin of metal species in the human brain: a perspective on key physicochemical properties.Metallomics : integrated biometal science · 2025Review
- Brain tissue metal concentrations and Alzheimer's disease neuropathology in total joint arthroplasty patients versus controls.Acta neuropathologica · 2025Article
- The Role of Metal Nanoparticles in the Pathogenesis of Stone Formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Temporal and spatial resolution of magnetosome degradation at the subcellular level in a 3D lung carcinoma model.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Within-city spatial variations in PMScientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Oxidative Stress, Cytotoxic and Inflammatory Effects of Urban Ultrafine Road-Deposited Dust from the UK and Mexico in Human Epithelial Lung (Calu-3) Cells.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Iron in Alzheimer's Disease: From Physiology to Disease Disabilities.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- The effect of Covid-19 lockdown on airborne particulate matter in Rome, Italy: A magnetic point of view.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The presence of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in the human brain was attributed until recently to endogenous formation; associated with a putative navigational sense, or with pathological mishandling of brain iron within senile plaques. Conversely, an exogenous, high-temperature source of brain MNPs has been newly identified, based on their variable sizes/concentrations, rounded shapes/surface crystallites, and co-association with non-physiological metals (e.g., platinum, cobalt). Here, we examined the concentration and regional distribution of brain magnetite/maghemite, by magnetic remanence measurements of 147 samples of fresh/frozen tissues, from Alzheimer's disease (AD) and pathologically-unremarkable brains (80-98 years at death) from the Manchester Brain Bank (MBB), UK. The magnetite/maghemite concentrations varied between individual cases, and different brain regions, with no significant difference between the AD and non-AD cases. Similarly, all the elderly MBB brains contain varying concentrations of non-physiological metals (e.g. lead, cerium), suggesting universal incursion of environmentally-sourced particles, likely across the geriatric blood-brain barrier (BBB). Cerebellar Manchester samples contained significantly lower (~ 9×) ferrimagnetic content compared with those from a young (29 years ave.), neurologically-damaged Mexico City cohort. Investigation of younger, variably-exposed cohorts, prior to loss of BBB integrity, seems essential to understand early brain impacts of exposure to exogenous magnetite/maghemite and other metal-rich pollution particles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.