Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33931503›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Threshold accumulation of a constitutive protein explains

Mia Panlilio, Jacopo Grilli, Giorgio Tallarico, Ilaria Iuliani, Bianca Sclavi, Pietro Cicuta, Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary Advantage of Cell Size Control.Physical review letters · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A GeneralizedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Minorities drive growth resumption in cross-feeding microbial communities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mia PanlilioCavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 1TN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0396-6698
Jacopo GrilliQuantitative Life Sciences, The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, 34151 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8235-5803
Giorgio TallaricoDipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3925-9699
Ilaria IulianiIstituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare (IFOM) Foundation, Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (FIRC) Institute of Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1758-0497
Bianca SclaviCampus Pierre and Marie Curie, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3883-8592
Pietro CicutaCavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 1TN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9193-8496
Marco Cosentino LagomarsinoDipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; marco.cosentino-lagomarsino@ifom.eu.ORCID 0000-0003-0235-0445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a boost of recent progress in dynamic single-cell measurements and analyses in

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalCell CycleCell DivisionCell ProliferationChromosomes, BacterialDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliNutrientsSingle-Cell AnalysisNutrientscell divisioncell growthE. colimathematical modelingsingle-cell biology

Identifiers

PMID33931503
PMCPMC8106335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.