Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33931306›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2021

What Is the Readiness Potential?

Aaron Schurger, Pengbo 'Ben' Hu, Joanna Pak, Adina L Roskies

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Factors that influence the amplitude of the bereitschaftspotential.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontocentral Neural Dynamics Reflect Decisions about When to Act.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. A Neural Signature of the Bias Toward Self-Focus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aaron SchurgerDepartment of Psychology, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA 92867, USA; Institute for Interdisciplinary Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618, USA; INSERM, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, NeuroSpin Center, Gif sur Yvette 91191, France; Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Direction des Sciences du Vivant, I2BM, NeuroSpin Center, Gif sur Yvette 91191, France. Electronic address: schurger@chapman.edu.
Pengbo 'Ben' HuDepartment of Linguistics and Cognitive Science, Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
Joanna PakInstitute for Interdisciplinary Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 92618, USA.
Adina L RoskiesDepartment of Philosophy and Program in Cognitive Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: adina.roskies@dartmouth.edu.
Chapman University · USCognitive Neuroimaging Lab · FRDartmouth College · USPomona College · US

Funding

Assessing the Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation on AgencyRF1MH117813 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ROSKIES, ADINA L · 2018 to 2018
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH117813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The readiness potential (RP), a slow buildup of electrical potential recorded at the scalp using electroencephalography, has been associated with neural activity involved in movement preparation. It became famous thanks to Benjamin Libet (Brain 1983;106:623-642), who used the time difference between the RP and self-reported time of conscious intention to move to argue that we lack free will. The RP's informativeness about self-generated action and derivatively about free will has prompted continued research on this neural phenomenon. Here, we argue that recent advances in our understanding of the RP, including computational modeling of the phenomenon, call for a reassessment of its relevance for understanding volition and the philosophical problem of free will.

Indexed as

Contingent Negative VariationVolitionBrainConsciousnessElectroencephalographyHumansIntentionMovementcomputational modelconsciousnessdecisionfree willintentionvolition

Identifiers

PMID33931306
PMCPMC8192467
OpenAlexW3157426850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.