Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33931060›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2021

Sensory adaptations reshaped intrinsic factors underlying morphological diversification in bats.

J H Arbour, A A Curtis, S E Santana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The ontogeny of asymmetry in echolocating whales.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J H ArbourPresent Address: Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, 37132, USA.
A A CurtisDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
S E SantanaDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA. ssantana@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6463-3569
University of Washington · USMiddle Tennessee State University · US

Funding

Division of Integrative Organismal Systems 1557125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorphological evolution may be impacted by both intrinsic (developmental, constructional, physiological) and extrinsic (ecological opportunity and release) factors, but can intrinsic factors be altered by adaptive evolution and, if so, do they constrain or facilitate the subsequent diversification of biological form? Bats underwent deep adaptive divergences in skull shape as they evolved different sensory modes; here we investigate the potential impact of this process on two intrinsic factors that underlie morphological variation across organisms, allometry, and modularity.

resultsWe use comparative phylogenetic and morphometric approaches to examine patterns of evolutionary allometry and modularity across a 3D geometric morphometric dataset spanning all major bat clades. We show that allometric relationships diverge between echolocators and visually oriented non-echolocators and that the evolution of nasal echolocation reshaped the modularity of the bat cranium.

conclusionsShifts in allometry and modularity may have significant consequences on the diversification of anatomical structures, as observed in the bat skull.

Indexed as

ChiropteraAnimalsPhylogenySkullAllometryComparative phylogeneticsEcholocationGeometric morphometricsModularitySkull

Identifiers

PMID33931060
PMCPMC8086122
OpenAlexW3159371568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.