Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33930834›Full record

ArticleHearing research2021

Nonlinearity of intracochlear motion and local cochlear microphonic: Comparison between guinea pig and gerbil.

Elika Fallah, C Elliott Strimbu, Elizabeth S Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Corti Fluid Is a Medium for Outer Hair Cell Force Transmission.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. The Origin Along the Cochlea of Otoacoustic Emissions Evoked by Mid-Frequency Tone Pips.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elika FallahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
C Elliott StrimbuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Elizabeth S OlsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States. Electronic address: eao2004@columbia.edu.

Funding

Diversity Supplement to Auditory Mechanics and Cochlear AmplificationR01DC015362 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ELIZABETH S. OLSON · 2016 to 2026
$5.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the in-vivo mechanical and electrophysiological cochlear responses in several species helps us to have a comprehensive view of the sensitivity and frequency selectivity of the cochlea. Different species might use different mechanisms to achieve the sharp frequency-place map. The outer hair cells (OHC) play an important role in mediating frequency tuning. In the present work, we measured the OHC-generated local cochlear microphonic (LCM) and the motion of different layers in the organ of Corti using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the first turn of the cochlea in guinea pig. In the best frequency (BF) band, our observations were similar to our previous measurements in gerbil: a nonlinear peak in LCM responses and in the basilar membrane (BM) and OHC-region displacements, and higher motion in the OHC region than the BM. Sub-BF the responses in the two species were different. In both species the sub-BF displacement of the BM was linear and LCM was nonlinear. Sub-BF in the OHC-region, nonlinearity was only observed in a subset of healthy guinea pig cochleae while in gerbil, robust nonlinearity was observed in all healthy cochleae. The differences suggest that gerbils and guinea pigs employ different mechanisms for filtering sub-BF OHC activity from BM responses. However, it cannot be ruled out that the differences are due to technical measurement differences across the species.

Indexed as

Basilar MembraneHair Cells, Auditory, OuterMotionAnimalsCochleaGerbillinaeGuinea Pigs

Identifiers

PMID33930834
PMCPMC8113154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.