ArticleNeuroImage2021
Longitudinal fMRI measures of cortical reactivation and hand use with and without training after sensory loss in primates.
Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced sensorimotor cortex responsiveness to nonplegic hand stimulation and motor network assembly during recovery after spinal cord injury in primates.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dense longitudinal neuroimaging reveals individual brain change trajectories.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026Review
- Characterizing Evoked Movement Patterns and Connectivity in Sensorimotor Cortex After Sensory Loss in Squirrel Monkeys.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025Article
- Review
- Machine-learning-based video analysis of grasping behavior during recovery from cervical spinal cord injury.Behavioural brain research · 2023Article
- Regressive changes in sizes of somatosensory cuneate nucleus after sensory loss in primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Differential Recovery of Submodality Touch Neurons and Interareal Communication in Sensory Input-Deprived Area 3b and S2 Cortices.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Sensory Circuit Remodeling and Movement Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In a series of previous studies, we demonstrated that damage to the dorsal column in the cervical spinal cord deactivates the contralateral somatosensory hand cortex and impairs hand use in a reach-to-grasp task in squirrel monkeys. Nevertheless, considerable cortical reactivation and behavioral recovery occurs over the following weeks to months after lesion. This timeframe may also be a window for targeted therapies to promote cortical reactivation and functional reorganization, aiding in the recovery process. Here we asked if and how task specific training of an impaired hand would improve behavioral recovery and cortical reorganization in predictable ways, and if recovery related cortical changes would be detectable using noninvasive functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We further asked if invasive neurophysiological mapping reflected fMRI results. A reach-to-grasp task was used to test impairment and recovery of hand use before and after dorsal column lesions (DC-lesion). The activation and organization of the affected primary somatosensory cortex (area 3b) was evaluated with two types of fMRI - either blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) or cerebral blood volume (CBV) with a contrast agent of monocrystalline iron oxide nanocolloid (MION) - before and after DC-lesion. At the end of the behavioral and fMRI studies, microelectrode recordings in the somatosensory areas 3a, 3b and 1 were used to characterize neuronal responses and verify the somatotopy of cortical reactivations. Our results indicate that even after nearly complete DC lesions, monkeys had both considerable post-lesion behavioral recovery, as well as cortical reactivation assessed with fMRI followed by extracellular recordings. Generalized linear regression analyses indicate that lesion extent is correlated with the behavioral outcome, as well as with the difference in the percent signal change from pre-lesion peak activation in fMRI. Monkeys showed behavioral recovery and nearly complete cortical reactivation by 9-12 weeks post-lesion (particularly when the DC-lesion was incomplete). Importantly, the specific training group revealed trends for earlier behavioral recovery and had higher magnitude of fMRI responses to digit stimulation by 5-8 weeks post-lesion. Specific kinematic measures of hand movements in the selected retrieval task predicted recovery time and related to lesion characteristics better than overall task performance success. For measures of cortical reactivation, we found that CBV scans provided stronger signals to vibrotactile digit stimulation as compared to BOLD scans, and thereby may be the preferred non-invasive way to study the cortical reactivation process after sensory deprivations from digits. When the reactivation of cortex for each of the digits was considered, the reactivation by digit 2 stimulation as measured with microelectrode maps and fMRI maps was best correlated with overall behavioral recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.