Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33930528›Full record

ReviewAnnals of epidemiology2021

Partnership dynamics in mathematical models and implications for representation of sexually transmitted infections: a review.

Darcy White Rao, Margo M Wheatley, Steven M Goodreau, Eva A Enns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Review of Network Models for HIV Spread.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Adapting Sexual Behavior Survey Data to Parameterize an Agent-Based Model of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Transmission.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Darcy White RaoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: dpwhite@uw.edu.
Margo M WheatleyDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Steven M GoodreauDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Eva A EnnsDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Funding

VENEREAL DISEASET32AI007140 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Julia Cook Dombrowski · 1985 to 2026
$19.4M
NCCIH Supplement to NCATS/CTSA Program for KL2 Scholars - M. SoddersKL2TR002317 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Christy Michelle McKinney · 2017 to 2026
$14.5M
Comparative Modeling to Inform Cervical Cancer Control PoliciesU01CA199334 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BARNABAS, RUANNE VANESSA, CANFELL, KAREN · 2015 to 2019
$6.4M
EpiModel 2.0: Integrated Network Models for HIV/STI Prevention ScienceR01AI138783 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JENNESS, SAMUEL · 2018 to 2021
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002317NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199334NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI138783NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models of sexually transmitted disease (STI) are increasingly relied on to inform policy, practice, and resource allocation. Because STI transmission requires sexual contact between two or more people, a model's ability to represent the dynamics of sexual partnerships can influence the validity of findings. This ability is to a large extent constrained by the model type, as different modeling frameworks vary in their capability to capture patterns of sexual contact at individual, partnership, and network levels. In this paper, we classify models into three groups: compartmental, individual-based, and statistical network models. For each framework, we describe the basic model structure and discuss key aspects of sexual partnership dynamics: how and with whom partnerships are formed, partnership duration and dissolution, and temporal overlap in partnerships (concurrency). We illustrate the potential implications of accurately accounting for partnership dynamics, but these effects depend on characteristics of both the population and pathogen; the combined impact of these partnership and epidemiologic dynamics can be difficult to predict. While each of the reviewed model frameworks may be appropriate to inform certain research or policy questions, modelers and consumers of models should carefully consider the implications of sexual partnership dynamics for the questions under study.

Indexed as

Sexually Transmitted DiseasesSexual PartnersHumansModels, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalSexual BehaviorCompartmental modelIndividual modelMathematical modelNetwork modelPartnership dynamicsReviewSexually transmitted infectionsSexual network

Identifiers

PMID33930528
PMCPMC8259505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.