ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2021
Comprehensive Allele Genotyping in Critical Pharmacogenes Reduces Residual Clinical Risk in Diverse Populations.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analytical and Clinical Validation of Action PharmaKitDx: A Comprehensive NGS Panel for the Identification of Pharmacogenetic Variants in Diverse Populations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing paroxetine treatment in depression: predicting remission and plasma concentration, and validating and updating therapeutic reference ranges.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- A call for increased inclusivity and global representation in pharmacogenetic testing.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Characterization of pharmacogenomic variants in a Brazilian admixed cohort of elderly individuals based on whole-genome sequencing data.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Global perspectives onFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic-guided pharmaceutical prescribing is increasingly recognized as an important clinical application of genetics. Accurate genotyping of pharmacogenomic (PGx) genes can be difficult, owing to their complex genetic architecture involving combinations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and structural variation. Here, we introduce the Helix PGx database, an open-source star allele, genotype, and resulting metabolic phenotype frequency database for CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP4F2, based on short-read sequencing of >86,000 unrelated individuals enrolled in the Helix DNA Discovery Project. The database is annotated using a pipeline that is clinically validated against a broad range of alleles and designed to call CYP2D6 structural variants with high (98%) accuracy. We find that CYP2D6 has greater allelic diversity than the other genes, manifest in both a long tail of low-frequency star alleles, as well as a disproportionate fraction (36%) of all novel predicted loss-of-function variants identified. Across genes, we observe that many rare alleles (<0.1% frequency) in the overall cohort have 10 times higher frequency in one or more subgroups with non-European genetic ancestry. Extending these PGx genotypes to predicted metabolic phenotypes, we demonstrate that >90% of the cohort harbors a high-risk variant in one of the four pharmacogenes. Based on the recorded prescriptions for >30,000 individuals in the Healthy Nevada Project, combined with predicted PGx metabolic phenotypes, we anticipate that standard-of-care screening of these 4 pharmacogenes could impact nearly half of the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.