Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33930066›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Potential for online crowdsourced biological recording data to complement surveillance for arthropod vectors.

Benjamin Cull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. "WhatsBarb" Citizen Surveillance: Survey of Insects Mistaken for Triatomines.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2025
    Article
  4. Molecular detection ofIranian journal of veterinary research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Citizen Science Mosquito Surveillance by Ad Hoc Observation Using the iNaturalist Platform.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Monitoring Risk: Tick andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Benjamin CullDepartment of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6814-5669

Funding

Tick-Mammal Interface of Human Granulocytic AnaplasmosisR01AI042792 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MUNDERLOH, ULRIKE GERTRUD · 2005 to 2020
$8.7M
Development of Paratransgenic Ticks for Disease ControlR01AI049424 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MUNDERLOH, ULRIKE GERTRUD · 2002 to 2022
$6.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042792NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary contributions by citizen scientists can gather large datasets covering wide geographical areas, and are increasingly utilized by researchers for multiple applications, including arthropod vector surveillance. Online platforms such as iNaturalist accumulate crowdsourced biological observations from around the world and these data could also be useful for monitoring vectors. The aim of this study was to explore the availability of observations of important vector taxa on the iNaturalist platform and examine the utility of these data to complement existing vector surveillance activities. Of ten vector taxa investigated, records were most numerous for mosquitoes (Culicidae; 23,018 records, 222 species) and ticks (Ixodida; 16,214 records, 87 species), with most data from 2019-2020. Case studies were performed to assess whether images associated with records were of sufficient quality to identify species and compare iNaturalist observations of vector species to the known situation at the state, national and regional level based on existing published data. Firstly, tick data collected at the national (United Kingdom) or state (Minnesota, USA) level were sufficient to determine seasonal occurrence and distribution patterns of important tick species, and were able to corroborate and complement known trends in tick distribution. Importantly, tick species with expanding distributions (Haemaphysalis punctata in the UK, and Amblyomma americanum in Minnesota) were also detected. Secondly, using iNaturalist data to monitor expanding tick species in Europe (Hyalomma spp.) and the USA (Haemaphysalis longicornis), and invasive Aedes mosquitoes in Europe, showed potential for tracking these species within their known range as well as identifying possible areas of expansion. Despite known limitations associated with crowdsourced data, this study shows that iNaturalist can be a valuable source of information on vector distribution and seasonality that could be used to supplement existing vector surveillance data, especially at a time when many surveillance programs may have been interrupted by COVID-19 restrictions.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceCrowdsourcingAnimal DistributionAnimalsArthropod VectorsCulicidaeDatabases, FactualEuropeHumansIntroduced SpeciesPopulation DensityTicksUnited KingdomUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33930066
PMCPMC8087023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.