Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33930016›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Efficient and robust coding in heterogeneous recurrent networks.

Fleur Zeldenrust, Boris Gutkin, Sophie Denéve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Design principles for cost functions in optimal sensory coding.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The functional role of oscillatory dynamics in neocortical circuits: A computational perspective.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neural heterogeneity controls computations in spiking neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Intrinsic neural diversity quenches the dynamic volatility of neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fleur ZeldenrustDepartment of Neurophysiology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9084-9520
Boris GutkinGroup for Neural Theory, INSERM U960, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normal Supérieure PSL University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6409-979X
Sophie DenéveGroup for Neural Theory, INSERM U960, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normal Supérieure PSL University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9318-9636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical networks show a large heterogeneity of neuronal properties. However, traditional coding models have focused on homogeneous populations of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Here, we analytically derive a class of recurrent networks of spiking neurons that close to optimally track a continuously varying input online, based on two assumptions: 1) every spike is decoded linearly and 2) the network aims to reduce the mean-squared error between the input and the estimate. From this we derive a class of predictive coding networks, that unifies encoding and decoding and in which we can investigate the difference between homogeneous networks and heterogeneous networks, in which each neurons represents different features and has different spike-generating properties. We find that in this framework, 'type 1' and 'type 2' neurons arise naturally and networks consisting of a heterogeneous population of different neuron types are both more efficient and more robust against correlated noise. We make two experimental predictions: 1) we predict that integrators show strong correlations with other integrators and resonators are correlated with resonators, whereas the correlations are much weaker between neurons with different coding properties and 2) that 'type 2' neurons are more coherent with the overall network activity than 'type 1' neurons.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeurons

Identifiers

PMID33930016
PMCPMC8115785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.