Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33929948›Full record

ArticleJournal of hospital medicine2021

SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Among Healthcare Workers by Job Function and Work Location in a New York Inner-City Hospital.

Murli U Purswani, Jessica Bucciarelli, Jose Tiburcio, Shamuel M Yagudayev, Georgia H Connell, Arafat A Omidiran, Launcelot Hannaway, Cosmina Zeana, Maureen Healy, Gary Yu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hospital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in hospital workers in the southern region of Minas Gerais state in Brazil: An analysis of the pre-vaccine period.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Murli U PurswaniDivision of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, BronxCare Health System, Bronx, NY.
Jessica BucciarelliDepartment of Family Medicine, Bronx-Care Health System Bronx, NY.
Jose TiburcioDepartment of Family Medicine, Bronx-Care Health System Bronx, NY.
Shamuel M YagudayevDepartment of Family Medicine, Bronx-Care Health System Bronx, NY.
Georgia H ConnellPatient Care Services, Ambulatory Care, BronxCare Health System Bronx, NY.
Arafat A OmidiranDepartment of Family Medicine, Bronx-Care Health System Bronx, NY.
Launcelot HannawayDepartment of Family Medicine, Bronx-Care Health System Bronx, NY.
Cosmina ZeanaDivision of Adult Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, Bronx, NY.
Maureen HealyDepartment of Family Medicine, Bronx-Care Health System Bronx, NY.
Gary YuRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY.
Doug ReichDepartment of Family Medicine, Bronx-Care Health System Bronx, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the seroprevalence and risk for SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare workers (HCWs) by job function and work location following the pandemic's first wave in New York City (NYC).

methodsA cross-sectional study conducted between May 18 and June 26, 2020, during which HCWs at a large inner-city teaching hospital in NYC received voluntary antibody testing. The main outcome was presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies indicating previous infection. Seroprevalence and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for seropositivity by type and location of work were calculated using logistic regression analyses.

resultsOf 2,749 HCWs tested, 831 tested positive, yielding a crude seroprevalence of 30.2% (95% CI, 29%-32%). Seroprevalence ranged from 11.1% for pharmacy staff to 44.0% for nonclinical HCWs comprised of patient transporters and housekeeping and security staff, with 37.5% for nurses and 20.9% for administrative staff. Compared to administrative staff, aORs (95% CIs) for seropositivity were 2.54 (1.64-3.94) for nurses; 2.51 (1.42-4.43) for nonclinical HCWs; between 1.70 and 1.83 for allied HCWs such as patient care technicians, social workers, registration clerks and therapists; and 0.80 (0.50-1.29) for physicians. Compared to office locations, aORs for the emergency department and inpatient units were 2.27 (1.53-3.37) and 1.48 (1.14-1.92), respectively.

conclusionOne-third of hospital-based HCWs were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 by the end of the first wave in NYC. Seroprevalence differed by job function and work location, with the highest estimated risk for nurses and the emergency department, respectively. These findings support current nationwide policy prioritizing HCWs for receipt of newly authorized COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHospitals, TeachingHumansInfection ControlMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityOccupationsSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic Studies

Identifiers

PMID33929948
PMCPMC8086991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.