Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33929901›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021

Ovary: MRI characterisation and O-RADS MRI.

Elizabeth A Sadowski, Katherine E Maturen, Andrea Rockall, Caroline Reinhold, Helen Addley, Priyanka Jha, Nishat Bharwani, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pictorial review of bilateral adnexal lesions.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey.Insights into imaging · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. The British journal of radiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth A SadowskiDepartments of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Katherine E MaturenDepartment of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Andrea RockallDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Caroline ReinholdMcGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Helen AddleyCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Priyanka JhaDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San francisco, CA, USA.
Nishat BharwaniDepartment of Radiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraSorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound has a high specificity for the diagnosis of a benign lesion in cases of classic appearing simple cyst, hemorrhagic cyst, endometrioma and dermoid. However, ultrasound can sometimes be limited for definitive characterisation and risk stratification of other types of lesions, including those with echogenic content that may appear solid, with or without blood flow. Frequently, MRI can be used to further characterise these types of lesions, due to its ability to distinguish solid tissue from non-tissue solid components such as fat, blood, or debris. Incorporating the MR imaging into the evaluation of adnexal lesions can improve diagnostic certainty and guide clinical management potentially avoiding inappropriate surgery for benign lesions and expediting appropriate treatment for malignant lesions, particularly in the females with sonographically indeterminate adnexal lesions.

Indexed as

Radiology Information SystemsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOvarian DiseasesOvary

Identifiers

PMID33929901
PMCPMC9327753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.