ArticleJournal of nephrology2021
Recovering histological sections for ultrastructural diagnosis of glomerular diseases through the pop-off technique.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histological findings of diabetic kidneys transplanted in non-diabetic recipients: a case series.International urology and nephrology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionElectron microscopy (EM) represents an indispensable technique for the diagnosis of kidney glomerular diseases. When dedicated tissue is not available, histological and cryostat sections can be reprocessed for EM using the pop-off technique. Here the practical value of this technique is analysed with emphasis on its accuracy in measuring basement membrane thickness and detecting immune deposits.
methodsNinety-four histological sections of kidney tissues fixed in Serra's solution, stained with H&E, PAS, and Masson's Trichrome; for EM analysis, the sections were recovered from either treated or untreated microscope slides through the pop-off technique. Some sections were recovered from cryosections allocated for immunofluorescence.
resultsThe ultrastructural details were sufficiently maintained on tissues fixed with Serra's solution despite being considered disadvantageous for EM. The type of microscope slides and the time of biopsy storage did not affect the quality of section recovery. The histological stains had only moderate effects on the electron-density of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). The pop-off technique reduced the GBM thickness when compared to the conventional EM processing but preserved the electron density of immune deposits.
conclusionsThe application of the pop-off method to renal biopsy is a useful recovery method that produces limited but satisfactory results when there is no suitable material for EM. The ultrastructural morphology was retained even from tissues fixed with Serra's solution, and deposits maintained the expected electron density, however, we observed an overall thickness reduction of the GBM that could have a potential impact on thin membrane disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.