Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33929656›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology review2022

Virtual-Reality Performance-Based Assessment of Cognitive Functions in Adult Patients With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Claudia Corti, Maria Chiara Oprandi, Mathilde Chevignard, Ashok Jansari, Viola Oldrati, Elisabetta Ferrari, Monica Martignoni, Romina Romaniello, Sandra Strazzer, Alessandra Bardoni

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claudia CortiScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy. claudia.corti@lanostrafamiglia.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1466-3182
Maria Chiara OprandiScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0555-6150
Mathilde ChevignardRehabilitation Department for Children with Acquired Brain Injury, Saint Maurice Hospital, Saint Maurice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3533-3564
Ashok JansariGoldsmiths, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0195-6322
Viola OldratiScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7179-8767
Elisabetta FerrariScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4781-1367
Monica MartignoniScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8074-3821
Romina RomanielloScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8709-6732
Sandra StrazzerScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-6565
Alessandra BardoniScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8404-3857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) commonly present with impairments in cognitive abilities. As these competencies seem to be predictive of patients' abilities to reintegrate into the everyday settings, it is crucial to assess them properly. However, previous research has indicated that patients may perform relatively well on standard tests of cognitive functioning, but may nonetheless encounter significant difficulties in organizing and executing everyday tasks. In order to overcome this issue, virtual reality (VR) methods have been introduced in clinical practice with the aim of creating assessments that simulate real-world activities and thus, provide a clearer picture of patients' functioning in everyday settings. This review offers an overview of VR assessment tools described in the scientific literature between 2010 and 2019. Overall, 38 relevant records describing 31 different tools were found. Among these tools, 16 assessed executive functions and prospective memory, while the other 15 assessed visuo-spatial abilities. Although promising results have been reported, our analysis indicated that about half of the tools deliver tasks that differ from everyday activities, thus limiting the generalizability of patients' performance to the real-world. Moreover, a variety of methodological shortfalls related to study Internal and External Validity have been highlighted, which hamper the possibility of drawing definite recommendations on tool choice. These limitations suggest the importance of putting considerable efforts into the improvement or development of VR tools for patients with ABI for both research and clinical purposes, considering the great potential of this form of assessment.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesVirtual RealityAdultCognitionExecutive FunctionHumansNeuropsychological TestsBrain injuryCognitive abilitiesNeuropsychological assessmentVirtual reality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.