ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2022
Clinical risk factors for recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after primary native tissue prolapse repair.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individualized Prediction of Recurrence Following Uterine-Preserving Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using Internally Validated Machine Learning Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ten Years of Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A Case Series Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis reveals distinct molecular heterogeneity in vaginal cells between recurrent and primary pelvic organ prolapse patients.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Article
- Gracilis flap and partial colpocleisis of Kahr for pelvic organ prolapse after anterior exenteration: A case report.Case reports in women's health · 2024Article
- Identification of potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.Heliyon · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo define potential risk factors for recurrence of prolapse.
methodsThis short report included all women who presented with recurrence of prolapse as well as without any recurrence signs after a vaginal approach of native tissue prolapse repair at an urogynecological center in Austria.
resultsA total of 124 recurrence cases and 64 women with no signs of recurrence after their index prolapse surgery were included. Multivariate analysis identified advanced preoperative POP‑Q stage (pelvic organ prolapse-quantification) as an independent risk factor for postoperative recurrence of prolapse (p = 0.045).
conclusionInitial proper preoperative counseling is of particular importance to modulate patients' expectations after prolapse surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.