ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2021
A bespoke health risk assessment methodology for the radiation protection of astronauts.
Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dosimetric advantages and clinical feasibility of a novel lateral decubitus position for left breast cancer patients undergoing PORT.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Space agency-specific standards for crew dose and risk assessment of ionising radiation exposures for the International Space Station.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Review
- Time-integrated radiation risk metrics and interpopulation variability of survival.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Comparison of dose and risk estimates between ISS Partner Agencies for a 30-day lunar mission.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Review
- European astronaut radiation related cancer risk assessment using dosimetric calculations of organ dose equivalents.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Application of multi-method-multi-model inference to radiation related solid cancer excess risks models for astronaut risk assessment.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Towards sustainable human space exploration-priorities for radiation research to quantify and mitigate radiation risks.NPJ microgravity · 2023Review
- Evaluation of deep space exploration risks and mitigations against radiation and microgravity.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Routine omics collection is a golden opportunity for European human research in space and analog environments.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An alternative approach that is particularly suitable for the radiation health risk assessment (HRA) of astronauts is presented. The quantity, Radiation Attributed Decrease of Survival (RADS), representing the cumulative decrease in the unknown survival curve at a certain attained age, due to the radiation exposure at an earlier age, forms the basis for this alternative approach. Results are provided for all solid cancer plus leukemia incidence RADS from estimated doses from theoretical radiation exposures accumulated during long-term missions to the Moon or Mars. For example, it is shown that a 1000-day Mars exploration mission with a hypothetical mission effective dose of 1.07 Sv at typical astronaut ages around 40 years old, will result in the probability of surviving free of all types of solid cancer and leukemia until retirement age (65 years) being reduced by 4.2% (95% CI 3.2; 5.3) for males and 5.8% (95% CI 4.8; 7.0) for females. RADS dose-responses are given, for the outcomes for incidence of all solid cancer, leukemia, lung and female breast cancer. Results showing how RADS varies with age at exposure, attained age and other factors are also presented. The advantages of this alternative approach, over currently applied methodologies for the long-term radiation protection of astronauts after mission exposures, are presented with example calculations applicable to European astronaut occupational HRA. Some tentative suggestions for new types of occupational risk limits for space missions are given while acknowledging that the setting of astronaut radiation-related risk limits will ultimately be decided by the Space Agencies. Suggestions are provided for further work which builds on and extends this new HRA approach, e.g., by eventually including non-cancer effects and detailed space dosimetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.