Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33929338›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Using an Information Package to Reduce Patients' Risk of Renal Damage: Protocol for a Randomized Feasibility Trial.

Sharon Leitch, Alesha Smith, Jiaxu Zeng, Tim Stokes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharon LeitchDepartment of General Practice and Rural Health, Otago Medical School - Dunedin Campus, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9939-8773
Alesha SmithSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1056-9527
Jiaxu ZengDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Otago Medical School - Dunedin Campus, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-9019
Tim StokesDepartment of General Practice and Rural Health, Otago Medical School - Dunedin Campus, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1127-1952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a common cause of renal damage, especially when taken together with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-i) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) plus a diuretic - a combination known as the "triple whammy." New Zealand patients are at high risk of the "triple whammy" because they can easily purchase NSAIDs without a prescription and in nonpharmacy retail settings (eg, the supermarket), there is no legal requirement to include patient information sheets with medication, and direct-to-consumer drug advertising is permitted. A patient information package has been developed for those at greatest risk of the "triple whammy," consisting of a printable PDF and an interactive online learning activity. This information package aims to inform patients about their elevated risk of harm from NSAIDS and discourage use of NSAIDs. A randomized control trial was planned to assess the effect of the information package.

objectiveThis study aims to pilot the trial procedures for recruiting patients and providing patient information online and to assess the acceptability of the patient information package.

methodsA two-armed randomized feasibility trial will be undertaken in Northland, New Zealand. We will recruit 50 patients who are at least 18 years old from those who have signed up to receive email alerts through their general practice. Patients eligible for this study have been prescribed an ACE-i or ARB plus a diuretic in the past 3 months. They will be randomly allocated to 2 study arms. The intervention arm will receive access to an information package plus usual care; the control arm will receive usual care alone. Online surveys will be used to assess NSAID knowledge and NSAID use at baseline and after 2 weeks for both arms. The intervention arm will also evaluate the information package in an additional survey based on Normalization Process Theory (NPT) concepts. We will report the number and proportion of participants who are eligible and consent to participate in the trial. Response and drop-out rates will be reported for each trial arm. The numbers of patients who interact with the education package will be reported together with the patient evaluation of it.

resultsFunding has been obtained from the Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC 18-031). The University of Otago Human Research Ethics Committee (H21/016) has approved this trial. Consultation has been undertaken with The Ngai Tahu research consultation committee. The trial commenced on April 12, 2021.

conclusionsThis feasibility trial will test the study processes prior to commencing a randomized controlled trial and will determine the acceptability of the patient information package. We anticipate this work will provide useful information for other researchers attempting similar work. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/29161.

Indexed as

acceptabilitydigital interventionfeasibilitygeneral practiceinformationkidneymedication safetyNSAIDpatient educationprimary careprotocolrandomized controlled trialrenalrisksafetytriple whammy

Identifiers

PMID33929338
PMCPMC8122288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.