Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33929307›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2021

Defining Modern Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Anne E Holland, Narelle S Cox, Linzy Houchen-Wolloff, Carolyn L Rochester, Chris Garvey, Richard ZuWallack, Linda Nici, Trina Limberg, Suzanne C Lareau, Barbara P Yawn and 7 more

6 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 265 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
265citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05747885 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (RCS) in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Utility and Limitations

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2023 to 2023Enrolled547ConditionsRespiratory Disease
NCT06046547 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Integrating Palliative Care Education in Pulmonary Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorAveiro UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled58ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Interstitial Lung DiseaseArmsPulmonary rehabilitation integrating education about palliative care, Pulmonary rehabilitation
NCT06915740 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for COPD Patients; a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsCOPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)ArmsExercise
NCT07387432 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Role of Exercise in Functional Capacity of Smokers and Subsequent Development of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2025 to 2028Enrolled90ConditionsPreserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISM)ArmsExercise with telehealth group, Exercise group, No exercise group
NCT07394712 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comprehensive Maintenance Program: a Health Haven for COPD in Lleida.The NAPOLEON Project.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut de Recerca Biomèdica de LleidaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled86ConditionsCOPD - Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Randomised Controlled TrialArmsInterdisciplinary intervention
NCT07460999 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects and Mechanisms of Online Delivered Singing Training vs Usual Care in Patients With Persistent Symptoms 6-18 Months After Surgical Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) - a Multi-centre RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Chronic Obstructive Lung DiseaseArmsSinging training (Singing for Lung Health (SLH)), Control group: Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

265 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Equity in pulmonary rehabilitation delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

205 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Linzy Houchen-WolloffORCID 0000-0003-4940-8835
Carolyn L RochesterORCID 0000-0002-6343-6050
Chris Garvey
Richard ZuWallack
Linda Nici
Trina Limberg
Suzanne C Lareau
Barbara P Yawn
Mary Galwicki
Thierry TroostersORCID 0000-0003-2767-5027
Richard Casaburi
Roger S Goldstein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation is a highly effective treatment for people with chronic lung disease but remains underused across the world. Recent years have seen the emergence of new program models that aim to improve access and uptake, including telerehabilitation and low-cost, home-based models. This workshop was convened to achieve consensus on the essential components of pulmonary rehabilitation and to identify requirements for successful implementation of emerging program models. A Delphi process involving experts from across the world identified 13 essential components of pulmonary rehabilitation that must be delivered in any program model, encompassing patient assessment, program content, method of delivery, and quality assurance, as well as 27 desirable components. Only those models of pulmonary rehabilitation that have been tested in clinical trials are currently considered as ready for implementation. The characteristics of patients most likely to succeed in each program model are not yet known, and research is needed in this area. Health professionals should use clinical judgment to determine those patients who are best served by a center-based, multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. A comprehensive patient assessment is critical for personalization of pulmonary rehabilitation and for effectively addressing individual patient goals. Robust quality-assurance processes are important to ensure that any pulmonary rehabilitation service delivers optimal outcomes for patients and health services. Workforce capacity-building and training should consider the skills necessary for emerging models, many of which are delivered remotely. The success of all pulmonary rehabilitation models will be judged on whether the essential components are delivered and on whether the expected patient outcomes, including improved exercise capacity, reduced dyspnea, enhanced health-related quality of life, and reduced hospital admissions, are achieved.

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveDyspneaHospitalizationHumansQuality of LifeUnited Statesaccess and evaluationchronic obstructive/rehabilitationhealthcare qualitylung diseases/rehabilitationpulmonary disease

Identifiers

PMID33929307
PMCPMC8086532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.