Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33929282›Full record

ArticleJournal of sex research

Assessing the Within-Person Variability of Internal and External Sexual Consent.

Malachi Willis, Kristen N Jozkowski, Ana J Bridges, Jennifer C Veilleux, Robert E Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sex research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hey ChatGPT, Let's Talk About Sexual Consent.Journal of sex research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Malachi WillisInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow.ORCID 0000-0002-3173-3990
Kristen N JozkowskiDepartment of Applied Health Science and Kinsey Institute, Indiana University.ORCID 0000-0003-3894-5395
Ana J BridgesDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas.
Jennifer C VeilleuxDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas.
Robert E DavisDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, University of Arkansas.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual consent is often conceptualized as an internal willingness to engage in sexual activity, which can be communicated externally to a sexual partner. Internal sexual consent comprises feelings of physical response, safety/comfort, arousal, agreement/want, and readiness; external sexual consent includes communication cues that may be explicit or implicit and verbal or nonverbal. Most previous research on sexual consent has focused on between-person differences; little attention has been devoted to examining the within-person variation of sexual consent across time. We conducted a 28-day experience sampling methodology (ESM) study with a sample of adults (

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAdultArousalCommunicationEcological Momentary AssessmentHumans

Identifiers

PMID33929282
PMCPMC9239691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.