ArticleJournal of community genetics2021
Baseline knowledge and receptiveness to genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes in Chinese high-risk females.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A knowledge, attitudes, and practices study on BRCA mutations among family members of women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian or fallopian tube cancer.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- The Impact of an Educational Video in Arabic Language on Patients' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Genetic Testing for Cancer Therapy.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Attitude towards hereditary cancer risk management among women with cancer in Taiwan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Young Women with Breast Cancer in Resource-Limited Settings: What We Know and What We Need to Do Better.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited studies have examined the pre-counselling knowledge and attitudes of high-risk women on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndromes genetic screening in Asia Pacific regions, particularly among Chinese. After controlling cost, an intrinsic barrier to undertake such screening, comprehensive understanding of the baseline characteristics of this cohort towards HBOC genetic counselling and testing service (GT) could be sought. This study aimed at exploring the baseline knowledge, possible motivators, barriers, and decisional factors of undertaking such service. One hundred and forty-two Southern Hong Kong Chinese high-risk females (89.4% with cancer history; 10.6% were cancer-free at-risk family members) completed a questionnaire right before their pre-testing GT. Results showed that perceived benefits to self and family members with reference to cancer prevention are important decisional motivators. A sponsored cancer genetic testing service in this cohort was crucial as 71.3% would not have opted for self-financed screening. Pre-testing and post-testing counselling were essential, particularly for older and less educated high-risk individuals. More importantly, after thorough pre-counselling with Q&A session, the entire cohort in this study gave written consent to undertake GT. Moreover, those proven to be germline pathogenic variant carriers were willing to share the information with family members and successfully persuaded them to pursue GT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.